The specifics of the formation of the natural and artificial landscape of the historical industrial enterprises of the Kama region

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article is devoted to the peculiarities of the formation of the historical industrial territories of the Kama region in terms of their history, landscape, architecture and layout. The historical background of the founding of the Ural mining civilization and the features of the construction of Ural plants, including the choice of a site for the construction of the plant, technical features of factory dams and architectural and planning features of the layout of factory buildings, are considered. Pozhevsky and Ochersky factories are considered as examples of historical factory territories. Based on archival documents, books, articles and field surveys, an idea is formed about the factors that influenced the formation of the natural and artificial landscape of these territories, as well as about their current state.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S. G. Tkachenko

Saint-Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Author for correspondence.
Email: archtkachenko@yandex.ru

Postgraduate Student

Russian Federation, 4, 2nd Krasnoarmeyskaya Street, Saint Petersburg 190005

М. A. Granstrem

Saint-Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Email: arch_project@bk.ru

Candidate of Architecture, Associate Professor

Russian Federation, 4, 2nd Krasnoarmeyskaya Street, Saint Petersburg 190005

L. P. Lavrov

Saint-Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Email: leonid.lavrov@gmail.com

Doctor of Architecture, Professor

Russian Federation, 4, 2nd Krasnoarmeyskaya Street, Saint Petersburg 190005

M. S. Stieglitz

St. Saint Petersburg Stieglitz State Academy of Art and Design

Email: mstig@mail.ru

Doctor of Architecture, Professor

Russian Federation, 13, Solyanoy Lane, Saint Petersburg, 191028

References

  1. Alekseeva E.V., Bystrova.T.Y. Industrial’noe nasledie: ponyatiya, tsennostnyi potentsial, organizatsionnye i pravovye [Industrial heritage: concepts, value potential, organizational and legal foundations]. Yekaterinburg: TATLIN. 2021. 164 p.
  2. Shipitsyna O.A., Solonina N.S. A comprehensive study of the industrial heritage of the Middle Urals. The Twelfth Tatishchevsky Readings. Proceedings of the All Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Yekaterinburg, November 19–20, 2019. 145 p. (In Russian). EDN: XENVKL
  3. Solonina N.S., Shipitsyna O.A. Industrial’noe nasledie Urala: arkhitekturno-prezentatsionnaya aktualizatsiya [The industrial heritage of the Urals: architectural and presentation actualization]. Yekaterinburg. 2020. 380 p. EDN: EFHUYR
  4. Alekseeva E.V. Industrial heritage: species diversity, ways and methods of repurposing. Ural Historical Vestnik. 2021. No. 2 (71), pp. 46–54. (In Russian). EDN: OZERZE
  5. Alekseeva E.V. Historical symbols of urban identity: actualization of value. City, society, environment: history and vectors of development: Collection of materials of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Nizhny Tagil, October 28–29, 2022. Vol. 1. pp. 7–14. (In Russian). EDN: ZIAVNX
  6. Nikitin Yu.O. Tsepilova O. Synergistic analysis of the historical and cultural development of industrial architecture. Architecture and Engineering. 2021. Vol. 6. No. 1, pp. 32–39. EDN: EXMMVV. https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2021-6-1-32-39
  7. Pastukh O., Gray T., Golovina S. Restored layers: reconstruction of historical sites and restoration of architectural heritage: the experience of the United States and Russia (case study of St. Petersburg). Architecture and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 5. No. 2, pp. 17–24. EDN: SJMAYS. https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2020-5-2-17-24
  8. Popova D.D. Designing public spaces based on industrial heritage sites in Moscow. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2022. No. 1 (58), pp. 91–107. https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-4839-20221-91-107
  9. Kanochkina N.A., Popova D.D. Organization of public spaces in the context of the development of industrial tourism. Systemnye technologii. 2020. No. 34, pp. 77–83. (In Russian). EDN: HYEIJT
  10. Stiglitz M.S. Neparadnyi Peterburg: nasledie promyshlennoi arkhitektury [Neparadny Petersburg: the legacy of industrial architecture]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. 2020. 368 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Drawing of the stall (working) slot of the Ochersky factory in 1863 (copy, archive photographs)

Download (1MB)
3. Fig. 2. Drawing of the sewing slot of the Ochersky factory (copy, archive photograph

Download (3MB)
4. Fig. 3. Historical view of the stone buildings of the Pozhevsky plant (archive photographs)

Download (302KB)
5. Fig. 4. Drawing of the facade of the Pozhevsky factory in 1851 (archive photographs)

Download (926KB)
6. Fig. 5. Preserved objects on the plan of the Pozhevsky plant at the beginning of the XX century (archive photographs)

Download (4MB)
7. Fig. 6. View of the preserved factory from the dam (photo by S.G. Tkachenko)

Download (5MB)
8. Fig. 7. View of the preserved factory from the garden (photo by S.G. Tkachenko)

Download (17MB)
9. Fig. 8. View of the metal structures of the blast furnace (photo by S.G. Tkachenko)

Download (7MB)
10. Fig. 9. Facade of the Ochersk plant (archive photos)

Download (2MB)
11. Fig. 10. The plan of the Ochersk plant (archive photos)

Download (1MB)
12. Fig. 11. View of the historical appearance of the dam of the Ochersky factory (archive photos)

Download (371KB)
13. Fig. 12. View of the southern building of the Ochersk plant (photo by S.G. Tkachenko)

Download (3MB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Advertising publishing company "STROYMATERIALY"