COMPUTER SIMULATION OF BIPHASIC CATALYTIC PROCESS IN PRESENCE OF POLYMER MICROGELS

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Dissipative particle dynamics were used for the first time to simulate the reaction of biphasic catalysis with microgels adsorbed at the phase boundary with catalytic groups. It is shown that the rate of the catalytic process increases with the degree of deformation of the polymer network, which depends on the amount of the crosslinker and the solubility of the polymer in both phases. In this case, the highest rate of catalysis was observed for the microgel soluble in both phases due to an increase in its porosity (compared to amphiphilic microgels) and the “water–microgel–oil” contact area with a simultaneous decrease in the time for reagents to reach the catalytic groups due to the flattening of the microgel. The results obtained can be useful for increasing the efficiency of a wide range of catalytic reactions of the considered type through the use of network macromolecules.

Sobre autores

R. Gumerov

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Physics Department

Email: igor@polly.phys.msu.ru
Russian Federation, 119991, Moscow

M. Anakhov

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Physics Department

Email: igor@polly.phys.msu.ru
Russian Federation, 119991, Moscow

I. Potemkin

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Physics Department

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: igor@polly.phys.msu.ru
Russian Federation, 119991, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Karg M., Pich A., Hellweg T., Hoare T., Lyon L.A., Crassous J.J., Suzuki D., Gumerov R.A., Schneider S., Potemkin I.I., Richtering W. // Langmuir. 2019. V. 35. P. 6231–6255. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04304
  2. Anakhov M.V., Gumerov R.A., Potemkin I.I. // Mendeleev Commun. 2020. V. 30. P. 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2020.09.002
  3. Lyon L.A., Fernandez-Nieves A. // Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2012. V. 63. P. 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143735
  4. Richtering W. // Langmuir. 2012. V. 28 P. 17218–17229. https://doi.org/10.1021/la302331s
  5. Zlotin S.G., Kucherenko A.S., Beletskaya I.P. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2009. V. 78. P. 737–784. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2009v078n08ABEH004040
  6. Beletskaya I.P., Kashin A.N., Litvinov A.E., Tyurin V.S., Valetsky P.M., van Koten G. // Organometallics. 2006. V. 25. P. 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1021/om050562x
  7. Beletskaya I.P., Khokhlov A.R., Tarasenko E.A., Tyu-rin V.S. // J. Organomet. Chem. 2007. V. 692. P. 4402–4406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2007.06.056
  8. Beletskaya I.P., Kashin A.N., Khotina I.A., Khokh-lov A.R. // Synlett. 2008. P. 1547–1552. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1078430
  9. Beletskaya I.P., Selivanova A.V., Tyurin V.S., Matve-ev V.V., Khokhlov A.R. // Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2010. V. 46. P. 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070428010020016
  10. Xiong L., Zhang H., Zhong A., He Z., Huang K. // Chem. Commun. 2014. V. 50. P. 14778–14781. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc06573e
  11. Ahmed E., Cho J., Friedmann L., Jang S.S., Weck M. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022. V. 2. P. 2316–2326. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00367
  12. Hajji C., Haag R. Hyperbranched Polymers as Platforms for Catalysts. In: Dendrimer Catalysis. Gade L.H. (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. V. 20. 2006. pp. 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/3418_035
  13. Wiese S., Spiess A.C., Richtering W. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013. V. 52. P. 576–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201206931
  14. Ajmal M., Demirci S., Siddiq M., Aktas N., Sahiner N. // New J. Chem. 2016. V. 40. P. 1485–1496. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NJ02298C
  15. Borrmann R., Palchyk V., Pich A., Rueping M. // ACS Catal. 2018. V. 8. P. 7991–7996. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b01408
  16. Tan K.H., Xu W., Stefka S., Demco D.E., Kharandiuk T., Ivasiv V., Nebesnyi R., Petrovskii V.S., Potemkin I.I., Pich A. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019. V. 58. P. 9791–9796. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201901161
  17. Kleinschmidt D., Fernandes M.S., Mork M., Meyer A.A., Krischel J., Anakhov M.V., Gumerov R.A., Potemkin I.I., Rueping M., Pich A. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020. V. 559. P. 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.005
  18. Kleinschmidt D., Nothdurft K., Anakhov M.V., Meyer A.A., Mork M., Gumerov R.A., Potemkin I.I., Richtering W., Pich A. // Mater. Adv. 2020. V. 1. P. 2983–2993. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ma00407c
  19. Sabadasch V., Dirksen M., Fandrich P., Cremer J., Biere N., Anselmetti D., Hellweg T. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022. V. 14. P. 49181–49188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c14415
  20. Gumerov R.A., Rumyantsev A.M., Rudov A.A., Pich A., Richtering W., Möller M., Potemkin I.I. // ACS Macro Lett. 2016. V. 5. P. 612–616. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00149
  21. Gumerov R.A., Filippov S.A., Richtering W., Pich A., Potemkin I.I. // Soft Matter. 2019. V. 15. P. 3978–3986. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SM00389D
  22. Hoogerbrugge P.J., Koelman J.M.V.A. // Europhys. Lett. 1992. V. 19. P. 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/19/3/001
  23. Español P., Warren P. // Europhys. Lett. 1995. V. 30. P. 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/30/4/001
  24. Groot R.D., Warren P.B. // J. Chem. Phys. 1997. V. 107. P. 4423–4435. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474784
  25. Gama Goicochea A., Romero-Bastida M., López-Ren-dón R. // Mol. Phys. 2007. V. 105. P. 2375–2381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970701624679
  26. Thompson A.P., Aktulga H.M., Berger R., Bolintine-anu D.S., Brown W.M., Crozier P.S., in ’t Veld P.J., Kohlmeyer A., Moore S.G., Nguyen T.D., Shan R., Stevens M.J., Tranchida J., Trott C., Plimpton S.J. // Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022. V. 271. P. 108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171
  27. Komarova G.A., Kozhunova E.Yu., Potemkin I.I. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. P. 8549. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238549
  28. Voevodin V.V., Antonov A.S., Nikitenko D.A., Shvets P.A., Sobolev S.I., Sidorov I.Yu., Stefanov K.S., Voevodin V.V., Zhumatiy S.A. // Supercomput. Front. Innov. 2019. V. 6. P. 4–11. https://doi.org/10.14529/jsfi190201

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2.

Baixar (302KB)
Metadados
3.

Baixar (3MB)
Metadados
4.

Baixar (88KB)
Metadados
5.

Baixar (249KB)
Metadados
6.

Baixar (215KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Р.А. Гумеров, М.В. Анахов, И.И. Потемкин, 2023