Digital Markets and Digital Services: A New Stage of the EU Internal Market Regulation

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article explores the EU Digital Markets Law and Digital Services Law adopted in the fall of 2022. The new legislative framework aims to control large digital platforms and search engines that have become market dominant and abuse their power by discriminating against third–party businesses, and to make online platforms and intermediaries more accountable. The authors provide examples of troubling practices by such companies. The provisions of the first document apply to the socalled gatekeepers, which include service providers that have become gateways between businesses and end users and for this reason have a significant impact on the EU internal market, of the second one – to providers of intermediary services qualified as mere conduit, caching and hosting services. A separate group includes very large online platforms and search engines. The laws set quantitative thresholds for companies subject to the laws. They contain lists of rights and responsibilities of such companies. The laws caused conflicting responses. One group of experts supports them, believing that they will solve many problems faced by businesses and ordinary users. Other researchers argue that new laws were not necessary and existing legal framework should have been improved. They also criticize certain provisions of the laws. The authors conclude that the laws correspond to the current market reality, but their application changes the competition environment.

作者简介

L. Revenko

MGIMO University

Email: l.revenko@inno.mgimo.ru
Doctor of Sciences (Economics) Moscow, Russia

N. Revenko

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: reni100@yandex.ru
Candidate of Sciences (Politics) Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Арутюнян А.А., Бербенева А.Д. (2022) Эволюция антимонопольного регулирования цифровых платформ. Digital Law Journal. Т. 3. № 3. С. 79–96. DOI: 0.38044/2686-9136-2022-3-3-79-96
  2. Белов В.Б. (2023) Цифровая трансформация Европейского союза: через тернии к успехам? Научные труды ВЭО России. Т. 241. № 3. С. 213–226. doi: 10.38197/2072-2060-2023-241-3-213-226
  3. Кондратьева Н.Б. (2021) Декалог аграрной цифровизации ЕС. Общественные науки и современность. № 1. С. 73–84. doi: 10.31857/S086904990013995-6
  4. Толкачев С.А., Удалов И.Д., Темукуев С.А. (2022) Цифровизация обрабатывающей промышленности стран ЕС: приоритет развития киберфизических систем. Современная Европа. № 1(108). С. 169–183. doi: 10.31857/S0201708322010132
  5. Фролов А.В., Лысунец М.В. (2022) Актуальные аспекты цифровой трансформации экономики европейского региона. Вестник Московского университета им. С.Ю. Витте. Серия 1: экономика и управление. № 1(40). С. 61–71. doi: 10.21777/2587-554X-2022-1-61-71
  6. Циренщиков В.С. (2019) Цифровизация экономики Европы. Современная Европа. № 3. С. 104–113. doi: 10.15211/soveurope32019104113
  7. Andrés M.B. (2022) El nuevo Reglamento europeo de Mercados Digitales. Diario La Ley. No. 10150.
  8. Auer D., Manne G.A., Bowman S. (2022) Should ASEAN Antitrust Laws Emulate European Competition Policy? Singapore Economic Review. Vol. 67. Issue 5. P. 1637–1697. doi: 10.1142/S0217590821430025
  9. Chiarella M.L. (2023) Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA): New Rules for the EU Digital Environment. Athens Journal of Law. Vol. 9. Issue 1. P. 33–58. doi: 10.30958/ajl.9-1-2
  10. Claici A., Basalisco B., De Michiel F., Okholm H., Maier N. (2020) The economic rationale for vertical integration in the tech sector. Copenhagen Economics, Copenhagen, Denmark. 86 p.
  11. Díez Estella F. (2023) The DMA: a new Regulation for – or against – Digital Markets in the EU? SSRN. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4321589
  12. Dorsey E. (2020) Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better – Except in Big Tech?: Antitrust’s New Inhospitality Tradition. Kansas Law Review. Vol. 68. P. 975–1015.
  13. Guggenberger N. (2021a) Essential Platforms. Stanford Technology Law Revew. Vol. 24. Issue 2. P. 237–343. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3703361
  14. Guggenberger N. (2021b) The Essential Facilities Doctrine in the Digital Economy: Dispelling Persistent Myths. Yale Journal of Law & Technology. Vol. 23. P. 301–359. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3802559
  15. Kim Y.P. (2021) Does the Anti-Google Law Actually Help Google and Hurt Startups? The Georgetown Law Journal Online. Vol. 110. P. 120–134.
  16. Kim Y.P. (2023) A Revolution Without a Cause: The Digital Markets Act and Neo-Brandeisian Antitrust. Wisconsin Law Review. Vol. 2023. No. 4. P. 1247–1307. doi: 10.59015/wlr.XKPQ5575
  17. Kucina I. (2022) Effective Measures Against Harmful Disinformation in the EU in Digital Communication. The 8th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia: Conference Paper. University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia. P. 143–155. doi: 10.22364/iscflul.8.2.11
  18. Lambert T.A. (2022) Addressing Big Tech’s Market Power: A Comparative Institutional Analysis. SMU Law Review. Vol. 75. Issue 1. Article 8. P. 73–115.
  19. Picht P.G., Richter H. (2022) EU Digital Regulation 2022: Data Desiderata. GRUR International. Vol. 71. Issue 5. P. 395–402. doi: 10.1093/grurint/ikac021
  20. Serban A., Teixeira C. (2021) Data Protection and Digital Services – European Union Perspectives. Analele știinţifice ale Universităţii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași (serie nouă) știinţe juridice. Tomul LXVII. Supliment 2. P. 309–322. doi: 10.47743/jss-2021-67-4-22
  21. Weber M., Chovanculiak R. (2022) On the European Union’a Digital Market Act, “Fair Access” and Vertical Integration. INESS, Bratislava, Slovakia. 6 p.
  22. Yun J.M. (2020) Does Antitrust Have Digital Blind Spots? South Carolina Law Review. Vol. 72. Issue 2. P. 305–356. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3593467
  23. Andrés M.B. (2022) El nuevo Reglamento europeo de Mercados Digitales, Diario La Ley, 10150.
  24. Arutyunyan A.A., Berbeneva A.D. (2022) Evolyutsiya antimonopol'nogo regulirovaniya tsifrovykh platform [The Evolution of Antimonopoly Regulation of Digital Platforms], Digital Law Journal, 3(3), pp. 79–96. (In Russian).
  25. Auer D., Manne G.A., Bowman S. (2022) Should ASEAN Antitrust Laws Emulate European Competition Policy? Singapore Economic Review, 67(5), pp. 1637–1697.
  26. Belov V.B. (2023) Tsifrovaya transformatsiya Evropeiskogo soyuza: cherez ternii k uspekham? [Digital Transformation of the European Union: Through Thorns to Success?], Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 241(3), pp. 213–226. (In Russian).
  27. Chiarella M.L. (2023) Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA): New Rules for the EU Digital Environment, Athens Journal of Law, 9(1), pp. 33–58.
  28. Claici A., Basalisco B., De Michiel F., Okholm H., Maier N. (2020) The economic rationale for vertical integration in the tech sector, Copenhagen Economics, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  29. Díez Estella F. (2023) The DMA: a new Regulation for – or against – Digital Markets in the EU? SSRN. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4321589
  30. Dorsey E. (2020) Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better – Except in Big Tech?: Antitrust’s New Inhospitality Tradition, Kansas Law Review, 68, pp. 975–1015.
  31. Frolov A.V., Lysunets M.V. (2022) Aktual'nye aspekty tsifrovoi transformatsii ekonomiki evropeiskogo regiona [Relevant Aspects of the Digital Transformation of the Economy of the European Union], Bulletin of Moscow Witte University, Series 1: Economics and Management, 1(40), pp. 61–71. (In Russian).
  32. Guggenberger N. (2021a) Essential Platforms. Stanford Technology Law Revew, 24(2), pp. 237–343.
  33. Guggenberger N. (2021b) The Essential Facilities Doctrine in the Digital Economy: Dispelling Persistent Myths, Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 23, pp. 301–359.
  34. Kim Y.P. (2021) Does the Anti-Google Law Actually Help Google and Hurt Startups? The Georgetown Law Journal Online, 110, pp. 120–134.
  35. Kim Y.P. (2023) A Revolution Without a Cause: The Digital Markets Act and Neo-Brandeisian Antitrust, Wisconsin Law Review, 2023(4), pp. 1247–1307.
  36. Kondratieva N.B. (2021) Dekalog agrarnoi tsifrovizatsii ES [The EU Agricultural Digitalization Decalogue], Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 1, pp. 73–84. (In Russian).
  37. Kucina I. (2022) Effective Measures Against Harmful Disinformation in the EU in Digital Communication, in The 8th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia: Conference Paper, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, pp. 143–155.
  38. Lambert T.A. (2022) Addressing Big Tech’s Market Power: A Comparative Institutional Analysis, SMU Law Review, 75(1), pp. 73–115.
  39. Picht P.G., Richter H. (2022) EU Digital Regulation 2022: Data Desiderata, GRUR International, 71(5), pp. 395–402.
  40. Serban A., Teixeira C. (2021) Data Protection and Digital Services – European Union Perspectives, Analele știinţifice ale Universităţii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași (serie nouă) știinţe juridice, LXVII(2), pp. 309–322.
  41. Tolkachev S.A., Udalov I.D., Temukuev S.A. (2022) Tsifrovizatsiya obrabatyvayushchei promyshlennosti stran ES: prioritet razvitiya kiberfizicheskikh system [Didigalization of the Manufacturing Industry in the EU: Cyber-Physical Systems Priority Development], Sovremennaya Evropa, 1(108), pp. 169–183. (In Russian).
  42. Tsirenshchikov V.S. (2019) Tsifrovizatsiya ekonomiki Evropy [Digitalization of European Economy], Sovremennaya Evropa, 3, pp. 104–113. (In Russian).
  43. Weber M., Chovanculiak R. (2022) On the European Union’a Digital Market Act, “Fair Access” and Vertical Integration, INESS, Bratislava, Slovakia.
  44. Yun J.M. (2020) Does Antitrust Have Digital Blind Spots? South Carolina Law Review, 72(2), pp. 305–356.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024