Use of various nutritional support regimens in patients with transplanted hematopoietic stem cells

Aim. To study the impact of modified nutritional support (NS) versus standard NS on therapy tolerability and posttransplantation in patients with oncohematological diseases.
Subjects and methods. Fifty-three patients, who had been diagnosed as acute myeloblastic (n = 19) or acute lymphoblastic (n = 16) leukemias, lymphomas (n = 10), and other oncohematological diseases (n = 8) and had received large-dose polychemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), were prospectively examined.
The control group (n = 27) used standard NS (NS was prescribed when gastrointestinal (GI) events occurred; on day 1 after HSCT, the study group (n = 26) had modified NS added by glutamine dipeptide (0.57 g/kg/day). Energy demands were 35 kcal/kg/day; protein requirements were 1.5-1.7 g/kg/day. Artificial nutrition preparations were daily given through infusion pumps for 24 hours. In both groups, the criteria for NS discontinuation were natural assimilation of 60% of the required energy within 3 consecutive days or day 14 after HSCT when GI function was preserved.
Results. The patients receiving modified NS showed reductions in the incidence and severity of mucositis (p = 0.05), a less significant decrease in the laboratory and anthropometric indicators of nutritional status (p = 0.01), and a better hospital outcome on day 100 after HSCT (p = 0.01). There were no differences in the rate and severity of acute graft-versus-host reaction (p = 0.7%) and in one-year overall survival (p = 0.7%).
Conclusion. As compared with standard NS, modified NS enables a patient to sustain negative consequences of the conditioning regimen, HSCT in the early posttransplantation period.

hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, nutritional support, parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition