Study evaluating the impact of a combination of inotropic support and heart rate monitoring on prognosis and stabilization rate in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure (LEGION)

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of ivabradine and levosimendan in patients with acute circulatory decompensation.
Subjects and methods. The study enrolled 41 patients (20 men and 21 women) aged 61 ± 9 years, admitted for decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV). Ejection fraction averaged 21.6%. In most patients, systolic blood pressure was below 105 mm Hg and heart rate (HR) was 100-115 beats/min. Central hemodynamics was measured using the strip tests. The patients' clinical status was rated applying the scale accepted in Russia. In addition to conventional therapy, Group 1 patients received levosimendan and ivabradine and Group 2 took dopamine after randomization.
Results. A significantly more pronounced clinical improvement was noted in Group 1 patients at hours 48 and 72 of determination. There was a significantly more marked HR reduction in Group 1 at 24 and 72 hours of observation. By day 3 of observation, pulmonary wedge pressure was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2. In the same control periods, the increase in coronary perfusion pressure was significantly obvious in Group 1. The drastically increased level of N-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain-type natriuretic peptide was significantly reduced in both groups, but more considerably in Group 1.
Conclusion. In patients with decompensated heart failure on conventional therapy, the co-administration of levosimendan and ivabradine is more effective than the use of dopamine.

References

  1. Фомин И. В., Беленков Ю. Н., Мареев В. Ю. и др. Распространенность ХСН в европейской части Российской Федерации - данные Эпоха ХСН. Сердеч. недостат. 2006; 7(1): 4-7.
  2. Беленков Ю. Н., Мареев В. Ю., Агеев Ф. Т., Даниелян М. О. Первые результаты национального эпидемиологического исследования - эпидемиологическое обследование больных ХСН в реальной практике (по обращаемости) - ЭПОХА-О-ХСН. Сердеч. недостат. 2003; 4(3): 116-121.
  3. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005). Eur. Heart J. 2005; 26(11): 1115-1140.
  4. Cowie M. R., Mosterd A., Wood D. A. et al. The epidemiology of heart failure. Eur. Heart J. 1997; 18: 208-225.
  5. Innes C. A., Wagstaff A. J. Levosimendan: a review of its use in the management of acute decompensated heart failure. Drugs 2003; 63(23): 2651-2671.
  6. Munger M. A. Management of acute decompensated heart failure: treatment, controversy, and future directions. Pharmacotherapy 2006; 26(8, Pt 2): 131S-138S.
  7. Сычева И. М., Виноградов А. В. Хроническая недостаточность кровообращения. М.: Медицина; 1977.
  8. Remme W. J., Torp-Pedersen C., Cleland J. G. et al. Carvedilol protects better against vascular events than metoprolol in heart failure: results from COMET. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007; 49(9): 963-971.
  9. Nieminen M. S., Akkila J., Hasenfuss G. et al. Hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of continuous infusion of levosimendan in patients with congestive heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000; 36(6): 1903-1912.
  10. Fonarow G. C., Adams K. F. Jr., Abraham W. T. for the ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee, Study Group, and Investigators. Risk Stratification for In-Hospital Mortality in Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure Classification and Regression Tree Analysis. J. A. M. A. 2005; 293: 572-580.
  11. Fonarow G. C., Heywood J. T., Heidenreich P. A. et al. Temporal trends in clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes for heart failure hospitalizations, 2002 to 2004: findings from Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am. Head J. 2007; 153(6): 1021-1028.
  12. Silvers S. M., Howell J. M., Kosowsky J. M. et al American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Subcommittee. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute heart failure syndromes. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2007; 49(5): 627-669.
  13. Metra M., Torp-Pedersen C., Cleland J. G.et al. COMET investigators. Should beta-blocker therapy be reduced or withdrawn after an episode of decompensated heart failure? Results from COMET. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2007; 9(9): 901-909.
  14. Purcell H., Mach F. Heart rate as a cardiovascular risk factor: potential clinical benefit with ivabradine. Rev. Med. Suisse 2007; 3(113): 1375-1378, 1381-1382.
  15. Petersen J. W., Felker G. M. Inotropes in the management of acute heart failure. Crit. Care Med. 2008; 36(1; Suppl.): S106-S111.
  16. Endoh M., Hori M. Acute heart failure: inotropic agents and their clinical uses. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2006; 7(16): 2179-2202.
  17. The Digitalis Investigation Group. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997; 336(8): 525-533.
  18. Sukonthasarn A. Prognostic value of heart rate in cardiovascular disease. J. Med. Assoc. Thailand 2007; 90(11): 2538-2540.
  19. Kudaiberdieva G., Görenek B., Timuralp B. Heart rate variability as a predictor of sudden cardiac death. Anadolu Kardiyol. Derg. 2007; 7(Suppl. 1): 68-70.
  20. Thackray S., Easthaugh J., Freemantle N., Cleland J. G. F. The effectiveness and relative effectiveness of intravenous inotropic drugs acting through the adrenergic pathway in patients with heart failure-a meta-regression analysis. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2002; 4: 515-529.
  21. Giannakoulas G., Giannoglou G., Vassilikos V. et al. Clinical significance of acute neurohormonal response after levosimendan treatment. Am. J. Cardiol. 2006; 98(8): 1123-1124.
  22. Lucats L., Ghaleh B., Colin P. et al. Free in PMC Heart rate reduction by inhibition of If or by beta-blockade has different effects on postsystolic wall thickening. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007; 150(3): 335-341.
  23. Cleland J. G., Freemantle N., Coletta A. P., Clark A. L. Clinical trials update from the American Heart Association: REPAIR-AMI, ASTAMI, JELIS, MEGA, REVIVE-II, SURVIVE, and PROACTIVE. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2006; 8(1): 105- 110.
  24. Yilmaz M. B., Yalta K., Yontar C. et al. Levosimendan improves renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: comparison with dobutamine. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2007; 21(6): 431-435.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2010 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 

Address of the Editorial Office:

  • Alabyan Street, 13/1, Moscow, 127055, Russian Federation

Correspondence address:

  • Alabyan Street, 13/1, Moscow, 127055, Russian Federation

Managing Editor:

  • Tel.: +7 (926) 905-41-26
  • E-mail: e.gorbacheva@ter-arkhiv.ru

 

© 2018-2021 "Consilium Medicum" Publishing house


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies