ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENCY OF OXALIC ACID APPLICATION IN SOLUTION COMBUSTION SYNTHESIS OF CATALYST FOR PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN AND CARBON FROM METHANE

P. B. Kurmashov; Курмашов П. Б.; M. V. Popov; Попов М. В.; A. E. Brester; Брестер А. Е.; A. V. Ukhina; Ухина А. В.; A. G. Bannov; Баннов А. Г.

doi:10.31857/S2686953522600660

ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENCY OF OXALIC ACID APPLICATION IN SOLUTION COMBUSTION SYNTHESIS OF CATALYST FOR PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN AND CARBON FROM METHANE

作者: Kurmashov P.B.¹, Popov M.V.¹^,2, Brester A.E.¹, Ukhina A.V.³, Bannov A.G.¹
隶属关系:
1. Novosibirsk State Technical University
2. N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3. Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
期: 卷 511, 编号 1 (2023)
页面: 68-76
栏目: CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY
URL: https://ter-arkhiv.ru/2686-9535/article/view/651969
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686953522600660
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YRQGXE
ID: 651969

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取

##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问

订阅存取

详细
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

In this work, the parameters of catalyst synthesis by solution combustion method using oxalic acid as a reducing agent, were investigated. The catalysts activity in the process of obtaining hydrogen and carbon nanofibers by the catalytic decomposition of methane has been determined. The effectiveness of using this reagent for the preparation of a nickel catalyst (90% Ni/10% Al₂O₃) that does not require preliminary reduction with hydrogen was shown. Based on the regression analysis, it was found that among the catalyst synthesis parameters, the yields of carbon and hydrogen are most strongly influenced by temperature.

关键词

methane decomposition, hydrogen, carbon nanofibers, solution combustion, oxalic acid

参考

Kuvshinov D.G., Kurmashov P.B., Bannov A.G., Popov M.V., Kuvshinov G.G. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. № 31. P. 16271–16286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.179
Shen Y., Lua A. // J. Power Sources. 2015. V. 280. P. 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.057
Wang H.Y., Lua A.C. // Chem. Eng. J. 2015. V. 262. P. 1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2014.10.063
Kenzhin R.M., Bauman Y.I., Volodin A.M., Mishakov I.V., Vedyagin A.A. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018. V. 427. P. 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.227
Muto T., Asahara M., Miyasaka T., Asato K., Uehara T., Koshi M. // Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023. V. 274. P. 117931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.117931
Kurmashov P.B., Bannov A.G., Popov M.V., Kazakova A.A., Ukhina A.V., Kuvshinov G.G. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2018. V. 91. № 11. P. 1874–1881. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427218110198
Kurmashov P.B., Bannov A.G., Popov M.V., Brester A.E., Ukhina A.V., Ishenko A.V., Maksimovskii E.A., Tolsto-brova L.I., Chulkov A.O., Kuvshinov G.G. // Int. J. Energy Res. 2022. V. 46. № 9. P. 11957–11971. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7964
Kingsley J.J., Patil K.C. // Mater. Lett. 1988. V. 6. № 11–12. P. 427–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-577X(88)90045-6
Prakash A.S., Khadar A.M.A., Patil K.C., Hegde M.S. // J. Mater. Synth. Process. 2002. V. 10. P. 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021986613158
Popov M.V., Bannov A.G // AIP Conf. Proc. 2022. V. 2390. № 1. P. 020060. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0070001
Ermakova M.A., Ermakov D.Yu., Kuvshinov G.G., Plyasova L.M. // J. Catal. 1999. V. 187. № 1. P. 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1999.2562
Kuvshinov G.G., Mogilnykh Yu.I., Kuvshinov D.G., Zaikovskii V.I., Avdeeva L.B. // Carbon. 1998. V. 36. № 1–2. P. 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00131-0
Kuvshinov G.G., Popov M.V., Tonkodubov S.E., Kuvshinov G.G. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2016. V. 89. № 11. P. 1777–1785. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427216110070
Krutskii Yu.L., Bannov A.G., Sokolov V.V., Dykova K.D., Shinkarev V.V., Ukhina A.V., Maksimovskii E.A., Pichugin A.Yu., Solov’ev E.A., Krutskaya T.M., Kuvshinov G.G. // Nanotechnol. Russia. 2013. V. 8. № 3–4. P. 3212–3217. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078013020109
Pichugin A.Yu., Maksimovskii E.A., Krutskaya T.M., Netskina O.V., Bataev I.A. // Ceram. Int. 2017. V. 43. № 3. P. 3212–3217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.146
Brester A.E., Golovakhin V.V., Novgorodtseva O.N., Lapekin N.I., Shestakov A.A., Ukhina A.V., Prosanov I.Yu., Maksimovskii E.A., Popov M.V., Bannov A.G. // Dokl. Chem. 2021. V. 501. № 2. P. 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012500821120016
Bannov A.G. Prášek J., Jašek O., Shibaev A.A., Zajíčková L. Gas sensing properties of carbon nanomaterials. In: Proc. of the 2016 39th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (ISSE), Pilsen, Czech Republic, 18–22 May 2016. V. 2016. P. 449–451. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE.2016.7563238
Bannov A.G., Popov M.V., Brester A.E., Kurmashov P.B. // Micromachines. 2021. V. 12. № 2. P. 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12020186
Shinkarev V.V., Glushenkov A.M., Kuvshinov G.G., Kuvshinov D.G. // Appl. Catal., B. 2009. V. 85. № 3–4. P. 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.07.011
Shinkarev V.V., Glushenkov A.M., Kuvshinov G.G., Kuvshinov D.G. // Carbon. 2010. V. 48. № 7. P. 2004–2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.02.008
Bannov A.G., Uvarov N.F., Shilovskaya S.M., Kuvshi-nov G.G. // Nanotechnol. Russia. 2012. V. 7. № 3–4. P. 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078012020048
Dong Y., Ni Q., Li L., Fu Y. // Mater. Lett. 2014. V. 132. P. 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.084
Li Y., Li D., Wang G. // Catal. Today. 2011. V. 162. № 1. P. 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.12.042
Hadian M., Marrevee D.P.F., Buist K.A., Reesink B.H., Bos R., Bavel A.P., Kuipers H.A.M. // Chem. Eng. Sci. 2022. V. 260. № 22. P. 117938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.117938
Roslyakov S.I., Kovalev D.Yu., Rogachev A.S., Manu-kyan H., Mukas’yan A.S. // Dokl. Phys. Chem. 2013. V. 449. № 1. P. 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012501613030068
Kachala V.V., Khemchyan L.L., Kashin A.S., Orlov N.V., Grachev A.A., Zalesskiy S.S., Ananikov V.P. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2013. V. 82. № 7. P. 648–685. https://doi.org/10.1070/rc2013v082n07abeh004413