Preparation of copper and nickel based nanoparticles by magnetron sputtering and their use in sulfur–sulfur bond activation reaction

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The present work is devoted to a systematic study of the advantages and limitations of the magnetron sputtering method, which is a convenient and promising way to obtain nanosized particles directly from the bulk metal, when it is used to prepare nanoparticles of the first-row transition metals. In the course of the study, variation of sputtering media based on ionic liquids, eutectic solvents, low and high molecular weight organic compounds was carried out. Particles of copper, nickel, a copper-nickel alloy and a copper-zinc alloy were obtained. Using the example of the activation reaction of the sulfur–sulfur bond in diphenyl disulfide, it has been shown that up to 96% of the sputtered copper can be effectively used in catalysis, whereas in the case of nickel and zinc about three quarters of the metal can be converted to an inactive form, at the same time readily oxidizable components can act as sacrificial stabilizers for moderately active metal particles in sputtering two-component alloys.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

А. Kashin

N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: a.kashin@ioc.ac.ru
Rússia, 119991, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Biffis A., Centomo P., Del Zotto A., Zecca M. // Chem. Rev. 2018. V. 118. № 4. P. 2249–2295. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00443
  2. Dalton T., Faber T., Glorius F. // ACS Cent. Sci. 2021. V. 7. № 2. P. 245–261. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c01413
  3. Chan A.Y., Perry I.B., Bissonnette N.B., Buksh B.F., Edwards G.A., Frye L.I., Garry O.L., Lavagnino M.N., Li B.X., Liang Y., Mao E., Millet A., Oakley J.V., Reed N.L., Sakai H.A., Seath C.P., MacMillan D.W.C. // Chem. Rev. 2022. V. 122. № 2. P. 1485–1542. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00383
  4. Devendar P., Qu R.-Y., Kang W.-M., He B., Yang G.-F. // J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018. V. 66. № 34. P. 8914–8934. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03792
  5. Hayler J.D., Leahy D.K., Simmons E.M. // Organometallics. 2019. V. 38. № 1. P. 36–46. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00566
  6. Xia Y., Yang H., Campbell C.T. // Acc. Chem. Res. 2013. V. 46. № 8. P. 1671–1672. http s://doi.org/10.1021/ar400148q
  7. Xie C., Niu Z., Kim D., Li M., Yang P. // Chem. Rev. 2020. V. 120. № 2. P. 1184–1249. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00220
  8. Astruc D. // Chem. Rev. 2020. V. 120. № 2. P. 461–463. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00696
  9. Hong K., Sajjadi M., Suh J.M., Zhang K., Nasrollahzadeh M., Jang H.W., Varma R.S., Shokouhimehr M. // ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020. V. 3. № 3. P. 2070–2103. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b02017
  10. Ohtaka A. // Catalysts. 2021. V. 11. № 11. P. 1266. http s://doi.org/10.3390/catal11111266
  11. Cha J.-H., Park S.-M., Hong Y.K., Lee H., Kang J.W., Kim K.-S. // J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012. V. 12. № 4. P. 3641–3645. http s://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2012.5590
  12. Cloud J.E., McCann K., Perera K.A.P., Yang Y. // Small. 2013. V. 9. № 15. P. 2532–2536. http s://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201202470
  13. Cloud J.E., Yoder T.S., Harvey N.K., Snow K., Yang Y. // Nanoscale. 2013. V. 5. № 16. P. 7368–7378. http s://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr02404k
  14. Sarcina L., García-Manrique P., Gutiérrez G., Ditaranto N., Cioffi N., Matos M., Blanco-López M.d.C. // Nanomaterials. 2020. V. 10. № 8. P. 1542. http s://doi.org/10.3390/nano10081542
  15. Zhang J., Chaker M., Ma D. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017. V. 489. P. 138–149. http s://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.07.050
  16. Jiang Z., Li L., Huang H., He W., Ming W. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022. V. 23. № 23. P. 14658. http s://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314658
  17. Balachandran A., Sreenilayam S.P., Madanan K., Thomas S., Brabazon D. // Results Eng. 2022. V. 16. P. 100646. http s://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100646
  18. Nyabadza A., Vazquez M., Brabazon D. // Crystals. 2023. V. 13. № 2. P. 253. http s://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020253
  19. Wender H., Migowski P., Feil A.F., Teixeira S.R., Dupont J. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013. V. 257. № 17–18. P. 2468–2483. http s://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.013
  20. Cha I.Y., Yoo S.J., Jang J.H. // J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2016. V. 7. № 1. P. 13–26. http s://doi.org/10.5229/JECST.2016.7.1.19
  21. Qadir M.I., Kauling A., Ebeling G., Fartmann M., Grehl T., Dupont J. // Aust. J. Chem. 2019. V. 72. № 2. P. 49–54. http s://doi.org/10.1071/CH18183
  22. Cano I., Weilhard A., Martin C., Pinto J., Lodge R.W., Santos A.R., Rance G.A., Åhlgren E.H., Jónsson E., Yuan J., Li Z.Y., Licence P., Khlobystov A.N., Alves Fernandes J. // Nat. Commun. 2021. V. 12. P. 4965. http s://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25263-6
  23. Nguyen M.T., Deng L., Yonezawa T. // Soft Matter. 2022. V. 18. № 1. P. 19–47. http s://doi.org/10.1039/D1SM01002F
  24. Hirano M., Enokida K., Okazaki K.-i., Kuwabata S., Yoshida H., Torimoto T. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013. V. 15. № 19. P. 7286–7294. http s://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp50816a
  25. Zhou Y.-Y., Liu C.-H., Liu J., Cai X.-L., Lu Y., Zhang H., Sun X.-H., Wang S.-D. // Nano-Micro Lett. 2016. V. 8. № 4. P. 371–380. http s://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-016-0096-2
  26. Liu C., Cai X., Wang J., Liu J., Riese A., Chen Z., Sun X., Wang S.-D. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2016. V. 41. № 31. P. 13476–13484. http s://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.194
  27. Sriram P., Kumar M.K., Selvi G.T., Jha N.S., Mohanapriya N., Jha S.K. // Electrochim. Acta. 2019. V. 323. P. 134809. http s://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134809
  28. Tsuda T., Yoshii K., Torimoto T., Kuwabata S. // J. Power Sources. 2010. V. 195. № 18. P. 5980–5985. http s://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.027
  29. Cha I.Y., Ahn M., Yoo S.J., Sung Y.-E. // RSC Adv. 2014. V. 4. № 73. P. 38575–38580. http s://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA05213G
  30. Zhu M., Nguyen M.T., Sim W.J., Yonezawa T. // Mater. Adv. 2022. V. 3. № 24. P. 8967–8976. http s://doi.org/10.1039/D2MA00688J
  31. Chung M.W., Cha I.Y., Ha M.G., Na Y., Hwang J., Ham H.C., Kim H.-J., Henkensmeier D., Yoo S.J., Kim J.Y., Lee S.Y., Park H.S., Jang J.H. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018. V. 237. P. 673–680. http s://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.022
  32. Oda Y., Hirano K., Yoshii K., Kuwabata S., Torimoto T., Miura M. // Chem. Lett. 2010. V. 39. № 10. P. 1069–1071. http s://doi.org/10.1246/cl.2010.1069
  33. Luza L., Gual A., Eberhardt D., Teixeira S.R., Chiaro S.S.X., Dupont J. // ChemCatChem. 2013. V. 5. № 8. P. 2471–2478. http s://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201300123
  34. Chang J.-B., Liu C.-H., Liu J., Zhou Y.-Y., Gao X., Wang S.-D. // Nano-Micro Lett. 2015. V. 7. № 3. P. 307–315. http s://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-015-0044-6
  35. Liu C.-H., Liu J., Zhou Y.-Y., Cai X.-L., Lu Y., Gao X., Wang S.-D. // Carbon. 2015. V. 94. P. 295–300. http s://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.003
  36. Kashin A.S., Prima D.O., Arkhipova D.M., Ananikov V.P. // Small. 2023. V. 19. № 43. P. 2302999. http s://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202302999
  37. Lee C.-F., Liu Y.-C., Badsara S.S. // Chem. – Asian J. 2014. V. 9. № 3. P. 706–722. http s://doi.org/10.1002/asia.201301500
  38. Lee C.-F., Basha R.S., Badsara S.S. // Top. Curr. Chem. 2018. V. 376. № 3. P. 25. http s://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-018-0203-6
  39. Beletskaya I.P., Ananikov V.P. // Chem. Rev. 2022. V. 122. № 21. P. 16110–16293. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00836
  40. Kashin A.S., Arkhipova D.M., Sahharova L.T., Burykina J.V., Ananikov V.P. // ACS Catal. 2024. V. 14. № 8. P. 5804–5816. http s://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c06258

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Table 1

Baixar (117KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the magnetron sputtering device. M(0) is a metal in the zero oxidation state. (b) Liquids used as a medium. Liquids that are compatible with the vacuum of the sputtering chamber but interact with the sputtered particles are marked in red; inert stable media suitable for use in the synthesis of nanoparticles are marked in green.

Baixar (185KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 2. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectra in the 2–3 keV and 7–10 keV ranges for samples of the metal-containing phase isolated after the reaction between diphenyl disulfide and particles of copper (black curve), nickel (red curve), copper-nickel alloy (blue curve) or copper-zinc alloy (green curve) in a pyridinium ionic liquid medium.

Baixar (126KB)
Metadados
5. Fig. 3. STEM images of copper and copper-zinc alloy particles in a pyridinium ionic liquid medium (a) and (d) and the corresponding histograms of particle size distribution (b) and (d); STEM images of reaction mixtures obtained after treating copper and copper-zinc alloy particles with diphenyl disulfide in an ionic liquid medium (c) and (e).

Baixar (297KB)
Metadados

Nota

Represented by Academician of the RAS V.P. Ananikov


Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024