The structure of humates in aqueous solutions and their biological activity

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

When studying humate solutions, it is often not taken into account that humic substances (HS) can form supramolecular formations (SMFs) from molecular particles. These SMFs are highly stable, that is, the particles-molecules of HS do not separate from them spontaneously. It follows that at concentrations of the existence of SMFs, it is they, and not the particles-molecules of HS, that should be in solutions and determine their properties. The purpose of the study is to assess the influence of the form of existence of HS in solutions on their physico-chemical properties and biological activity. Solutions of sodium humate from brown coal were used in the work. The experimental results showed that with an increase in the concentration of humates, an abrupt increase in pH in the range of 30–50 mg l⁻¹ is observed. These concentrations correspond to the literature data on changes in the structure of HC in solutions: at concentrations above 30 mg l⁻¹ – barrier concentration – HS molecules form SMFs by self-assembly. Both molecular particles and SMFs, due to the diphilicity of HS, have the properties of surfactants. That is, in solutions at the interface of the “water–air” phases, HS films form. The strength of the films depends on the size of its constituent particles and the speed of their movement from the thickness to the surface of the solution. When plotting graphs in the coordinates “Film formation time in hours–Log humate concentration, mg l⁻¹”, a jump corresponding to the barrier concentration was detected on the curves. It was also found that during foliar treatment of cucumber shoots with mechanoactivated humate solutions with concentrations below the barrier, the stimulation effect increases, apparently due to the transition from the existence of HS in solution in the form of SMFs to existence in the form of particles-molecules that, due to their small size, can penetrate plant cells.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

G. N. Fedotov

Faculty of Soil Science of Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: gennadiy.fedotov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, 119992 Moscow

S. A. Shoba

Faculty of Soil Science of Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: gennadiy.fedotov@gmail.com

Corresponding Member of the RAS

Russian Federation, 119992 Moscow

I. V. Gorepekin

Faculty of Soil Science of Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: gennadiy.fedotov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, 119992 Moscow

T. A. Gracheva

Faculty of Soil Science of Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: gennadiy.fedotov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, 119992 Moscow

A. V. Kachalkin

Faculty of Soil Science of Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms named after G. K. Scriabin, Federal Research Center “Pushchinsky Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences”

Email: gennadiy.fedotov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, 119992 Moscow; 142290 Pushchino

U. A. Konkina

Faculty of Soil Science of Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: gennadiy.fedotov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, 119992 Moscow

D. A. Ushkova

Faculty of Soil Science of Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: gennadiy.fedotov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, 119992 Moscow

References

  1. Орлов Д.С. Гумусовые кислоты почв и общая теория гумификации. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1990. с. 325.
  2. Österberg R., Mortensen K. // Eur. Biophys. J. 1992. V. 21. № 3. P. 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196759
  3. Angelico R., Colombo C., Di Iorio E., Brtnický M., Fojt J., Conte P. // Appl. Sci. 2023. V. 13. № 4. 2236. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042236
  4. Senesi N., Wilkinson K.J. Biophysical chemistry of fractal structures and processes in environmental systems. Senesi N., Wilkinson K.J. (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2008. p. 342.
  5. Федотов Г.Н., Шеин Е.В., Ушкова Д.А., Салимгареева О.А., Горепекин И.В., Потапов Д.И. // Почвоведение. 2023. № 8. С. 903–908. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032180X22601608
  6. Милановский Е.Ю. Гумусовые вещества почв как природные гидрофобно-гидрофильные соединения. М.: ГЕОС. 2009. с. 186.
  7. Nardi S., Pizzeghello D., Muscolo A., Vianello A. // Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002. V. 34. №. 11. P. 1527–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00174-8
  8. Asli S., Neumann P.M. // Plant Soil. 2010. V. 336. P. 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0483-2
  9. Scherrer R., Louden L., Gerhardt P. // J. Bacteriol. 1974. V. 118. № 2. P. 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.118.2.534-540.1974
  10. De Nobel J.G., Barnett J.A. // Yeast. 1991. V. 7. № 4. P. 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.320070402
  11. Visser S.A. // Soil Biol. Biochem. 1985. V. 17. № 4. P. 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90009-4
  12. Fasurová N., Čechlovská H., Kučerik J. // Pet. Coal. 2006. V. 48. № 2. P. 24–32.
  13. Евдокимов И.П., Лосев А.П. Природные нанообъекты в нефтегазовых средах. М.: РГУ нефти и газа им. И.М. Губкина, 2008. с. 104.
  14. Arachchige M.S.A., Mizutani O., Toyama H. // Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2019. V. 33. № 1. P. 1505–1515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2019.1676167
  15. Spaccini R., Piccolo A., Conte P., Haberhauer G., Gerzabek M.H. // Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002. V. 34. № 12. P. 1839–1851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00197-9
  16. Воюцкий С.С. Курс коллоидной химии. М.: Химия, 1975. с. 512.
  17. Sampaio J.P. // Can. J. Microbiol. 1999. V. 45. № 6. P. 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1139/w99-020
  18. Tikhonov V.V., Yakushev A.V., Zavgorodnyaya Y.A., Byzov B.A., Demin V.V. // Eurasian Soil Sci. 2010. V. 43. P. 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229310030087

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The effect of humate C concentration on the pH of the solution.

Download (56KB)
3. Fig. 2. The influence of the concentration of humic substances on the strength of films formed on the surface of water.

Download (48KB)
4. Fig. 3. Effect of adding humates to the nutrient medium on the growth of Solicoccozyma terricola.

Download (47KB)
5. Fig. 4. Effect of adding humates to the nutrient medium on the growth of Saitozyma podzolica.

Download (49KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences