Evaluation of the effects from various ways of import substitution “input–output” method: Evidence from the Russian Federation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of assessing the economic effects of import substitution to determine the consequences of investment decisions at the state level in the context of geopolitical risks. Due to a number of economic restrictions on the part of Western countries, the problem of replacing those types of products for which trade turnover were suspended particularly acute. In the conditions of a dramatic shock reduction of supply in the markets of many industries, with the level of demand remaining, there is a need for emergent reorientation of domestic production. Public investments should take into account the multiplier effect caused by the impact of each industry's output on each other. The paper proposes methodology for constructing a theoretical model of global interaction of countries based on input–output tables that take into account the production needs of each industry in the production of other industries and the multiplicative effect. Two experiments, the impact on the economies of all the countries of termination of trade between Russia and the European Union in a number of industries with subsequent measures: the replacement of European products with goods and services through China as well as its import substitution at the expense of Russia's own product facilities. The consequences of two scenarios of changes in output, tax charges, imports and exports of Russia and the EU are estimated; long-term effects are predicted. The practical significance of this work consists in helping to make managerial decisions at the state level in financing certain sectors of the Russian economy.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Nikita A. Moiseev

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Email: emm@cemi.rssi.ru
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Vnukov

HSE University

Email: emm@cemi.rssi.ru
Russian Federation

Petr O. Sokerin

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Author for correspondence.
Email: emm@cemi.rssi.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2633-8849
Russian Federation, Stremyanny lane, 14.1

References

  1. Ажекбаров К.А., Абдуваитов Э.Ч. (2020). Экономические санкции ЕС против России и их по-следствия // Путеводитель предпринимателя. № 13 (1). С. 23–31.
  2. Ахмадеев Б.А., Моисеев Н.А. (2017). Метод расчета коэффициента влияния отрасли на эконо-мику // Аудит и финансовый анализ. № 1. C. 69–73.
  3. Баранов А.О., Гореев А.В. (2019). Оценка влияния национальных проектов на развитие эконо-мики России с использованием динамической межотраслевой модели // ЭКО. № 10 (544). С. 94–114.
  4. Барковский А.Н., Алабян С.С., Морозенкова О.В. (2015). Последствия западных санкций и ответных санкций РФ // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. № 9. С. 3–7.
  5. Головин А.А., Головин А.А., Пархомчук М.А. (2018). Последствия мировых экономических санкций для национальной экономики России // Фундаментальные исследования. № 11 (2). С. 216–221.
  6. Долматова В.Ю., Безуглова М.Н., Салман О.Ф. (2020). Влияние антироссийских санкций на экономику Российской Федерации // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки. №2. С. 130-134.
  7. Калинин А.М., Коротеев С.С., Крупин А.А., Нефедов А.В. (2021). Технологическая импорто-зависимость российской экономики: оценка с использованием таблиц «затраты–выпуск» // Проблемы прогнозирования. № 1 (184). С. 83–93.
  8. Кейнс М.Дж. (1936). Общая теория занятости, процента и денег (general theory of employment, interest and money). М.: Гелиос АРВ.
  9. Моисеев Н.А., Ахмадеев Б.А. (2021). Алгоритм оценки импортозамещения на основе таблиц затрат — выпуска // Вестник РЭА им. Г.В. Плеханова. № 3 (117). С. 117–129.
  10. Серебряков Г.Р. (2000). Опыт построения динамической межотраслевой равновесной модели российской экономики // Проблемы прогнозирования. №2. С. 1–17.
  11. Симачев Ю., Кузык М., Зудин Н. (2016). Импортозависимость и импортозамещение в российской обрабатывающей промышленности: взгляд бизнеса // Форсайт. № 4. С. 25–45.
  12. Широв А.А., Янтовский А.А. (2017). Межотраслевая макроэкономическая модель rim — раз-витие инструментария в современных экономических условиях // Проблемы прогнозиро-вания. № 3. С. 3–18.
  13. Юнюшкина А.С., Шаповалова К.А., Каткова Е.Ю. (2021) Торговая война США с Китаем как попытка вернуть глобальное лидерство // Международные отношения. № 2. С. 55–68.
  14. Chen Q., Zhu K., Liu P., Chen X., Tian K., Yang L., Yang C. (2018). Distinguishing China's processing trade in the world input-output table and quantifying its effects. Economic Systems Research, 31, 1–21.
  15. Hong J., Byun J.E., Kim P. (2016). Structural changes and growth factors of the ICT industry in Ko-rea. Telecommunications Policy, 40, 502–513.
  16. Lin H.C., Hsu S.H., Liou R.W., Chang C.C. (2016). A value-added analysis of trade in Taiwan and Korea’s ICT industries. Journal of Korea Trade, 20, 47–73.
  17. Luchinkin M. (2021). Protectionism and import substitution as part of the national policy of socio-economic and scientific-technological development. German International Journal of Modern Science, 22, 12–20.
  18. Mori T., Sasaki H. (2007). Interdependence of production and income in Asia-pacific economies: An international input–output approach. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, 26 (7), 1–29.
  19. Timmer M.P., Dietzenbacher E., Los B., Stehrer R., Vries G.J. de (2015). An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics, 23, 575–605.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. General presentation of the input-output table for one country

Download (60KB)
3. Fig. 2. Scatterplot of gross final consumption and gross value added

Download (11KB)
4. Fig. 3. Change in production in all countries, and in particular Russia, China and the EU after the transfer of imports to China

Download (284KB)
5. Fig. 4. Change in tax collections in all countries and in the EU, billion dollars

Download (129KB)
6. Fig. 5. Changes in imports and exports in Russia and the EU, billion dollars

Download (193KB)
7. Fig. 6. Change in output in the long run, billion dollars

Download (126KB)
8. Fig. 7. Change in final consumption in the long run, billion dollars

Download (130KB)
9. Fig. 8. Change in tax collections in the long run, billion dollars

Download (142KB)
10. Fig. 9. Changes in Russian imports and exports in the long run, billion dollars

Download (100KB)
11. Fig. 10. Change in production in different countries after import substitution, billion dollars

Download (270KB)
12. Fig. 11. Change in tax collections by country after import substitution

Download (123KB)
13. Fig. 12. Changes in imports and exports in Russia and the EU after import substitution

Download (90KB)
14. Fig. 13. Change in output in countries in the long run

Download (54KB)
15. Fig. 14. Change in final consumption in countries in the long run

Download (145KB)
16. Fig. 15. Change in tax collections in all countries in the long run

Download (138KB)
17. Fig. 16. Changes in imports and exports in Russia in the long run

Download (116KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody