Traditions, continuity and innovations in psychological and historical-scientific cognition
- 作者: Noskova O.G.1
-
隶属关系:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- 期: 卷 46, 编号 3 (2025)
- 页面: 147-150
- 栏目: Discussion
- URL: https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0205-9592/article/view/688385
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205959225030139
- ID: 688385
如何引用文章
详细
The text was prepared in the order of the discussion on the pages of the Psychological Journal of the article by Yu.N. Oleinik and A.L. Zhuravlev “Scientific traditions as a mechanism of continuity of psycholo-gical cognition”, published in two parts: Part 1. — “The state and difficulties of studying” and Part 2. — “Problems and prospects of research” (Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, № 3–4, 2024). The valuable ideas of the article under discussion, which are important for psychological science and its history, are noted; in addition, controversial provisions are highlighted, and options for their correction and addition are proposed.
全文:

作者简介
O. Noskova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: nog4813@mail.ru
ScD (Psychology), Professor, Professor of Department of Work and Engineering Psychology, Faculty of Psychology
俄罗斯联邦, 125009, Moscow, Mokhovaya str., 11/9参考
- Bogdanov A.A. Nauka ob obshhestvennom soznanii. Kratkij kurs ideologicheskoj nauki v voprosah i otvetah. Moscow: Knigoizdatel’stvo pisatelej v Moskve, 1914. 199 p.
- Gajdenko P.P. Vvedenie. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 3–11.
- Gusel’ceva M.S. Ponjatie progressa i ego otrazhenie v naukah o cheloveke. Progress psihologii: Kriterii i priznaki. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, T.D. Marcinkovskaya, A.V. Jurevich. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2009. P. 13–31.
- Kuznecova N.I., Rozov M.A. O raznoobrazii nauchnyh revoljucij. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 60–82.
- Nosulenko V.N., Terehin V.A. Peredacha znanij: obzor osnovnyh modelej i tehnologij. Jeksperimental’naja psihologija. 2017. V. 10. № 4. P. 96–115.
- Olejnik Ju.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 1. Sostojanie i trudnosti izuchenija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 3. P. 5–14.
- Olejnik Ju.N. Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 2. Problemy, podhody i perspektivy issledovanija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 4. P. 5–15.
- Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 264 p.
- Shackij E. Utopija i tradicija: Perev. s pol’sk. Ed. V.A. Chalikova. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 454 p.
- Jurevich A.V. Psihologija i metodologija. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2005. 312 p.
- Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Creat the Dinamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
补充文件
