Behavioral indicators in learning to distinguish between short time intervals

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

As part of a study of the process of acquiring a new skill, this paper compared groups of participants demonstrating varying degrees of skill acquisition and improvement of a skill formed using the “Yes/No” psychophysical task. It was assumed that when learning a new skill, the participants could acquire new experience at different rates and, thus, after the same number of behavioral acts of interaction with the task, have different degrees of formation of the new functional system, which would be manifested in differences in response time, “sensitivity index” d’, and decision criterion β. One group of participants (N = 28, 18 to 45 years, median 19 years, 7 males, 21 females) in the study were trained to discriminate between short time intervals presented in the visual modality in a single session, while a second group (N = 51, 18 to 32 years, median 22 years, 27 males, 24 females) underwent similar training in two sessions spaced 24 hours apart. It was shown that such effects as bias in the decision criterion score β, its independence from the “sensitivity” score d’, and longer time for the response category “No, there was no difference” compared to the response category “Yes, there was a difference” were observed only in the groups of higher-performing participants (demonstrating the skill without prior training) compared to other groups of participants (in all cases at p ≤ 0.05). These phenomena were not observed in the groups of lower performing participants (those who did not acquired skill and those who acquired skill as they progressed through the experiment). The obtained results are interpreted from the standpoint of the system-evolutionary approach on the basis of ideas about systemogenesis and the number of degrees of freedom of neuron and organism observed at the stage of mismatch and after the completion of the process of systemogenesis.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

E. Lugovskikh

State Academic University for Humanities

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: eugenelugovski@gmail.com

Master’s Student at the Faculty of Psychology

Ресей, 19049, Moscow, Maronovsky lane, 26

V. Apanovich

State Academic University for Humanities; Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: apanovitschvv@yandex.ru

PhD (Psychology), Docent, researcher at the lab. V.B. Shvyrkov Psychophysiology

Ресей, 19049, Moscow, Maronovsky lane, 26; 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, bldg. 1

K. Yudakov

State Academic University for Humanities; Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: kost05062000@mail.ru

Lecturer at the Department of Experimental Psychology and Psychodiagnostics at the Faculty of Psychology, Postgraduate student, junior researcher at the lab. V.B. Shvyrkov Psychophysiology

Ресей, 19049, Moscow, Maronovsky lane, 26; 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, bldg. 1

E. Aramyan

Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: aramyan.eric@gmail.com

Postgraduate student, junior researcher at the lab. V.B. Shvyrkov Psychophysiology

Ресей, 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, bldg. 1

D. Gladilin

Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow State Psychological and Pedagogical University

Email: dima.gladilin.psy@gmail.com

Postgraduate student, junior researcher at the lab. V.B. Shvyrkov Psychophysiology, Laboratory researcher at the Institute of Experimental Psychology

Ресей, 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, bldg. 1; 127051, 29 Sretenka St., Moscow

Yu. Alexandrov

State Academic University for Humanities; Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: yuraalexandrov@yandex.ru

Academic of RAE, ScD (Psychology), Professor, Head of the lab. V.B. Shvyrkov Psychophysiology, Head of the Department. Psychophysiology of the Faculty of Psychology

Ресей, 19049, Moscow, Maronovsky lane, 26; 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, bldg. 1

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Alexandrov Ju.I., Gorkin A.G., Sozinov A.A., Svarnik O.E., Kuzina E.A., Gavrilov V.V. Konsolidacija i rekonsolida- cija pamjati: psihofiziologicheskij analiz. Voprosy psihologii. 2015. № 3. P. 133–144. (In Russian)
  2. Alexandrov Ju.I., Druzhinin V.N. Teorija funkcional’nyh sistem v psihologii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1998. V. 19. № 6. P. 4–19. (In Russian)
  3. Anohin P.K. Principial’nye voprosy obshhej teorii funkcional’nyh system. Principy sistemnoj organizacii funkcij. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. P. 5–61. (In Russian)
  4. Apanovich V.V., Aramyan E.A., Gladilin D.L., Yudakov K.S., Karpov S.A., Gorkin A.G., Alexandrov Ju.I. Razrabotka i aprobacija psihofizicheskoj metodiki issledovanija priobretenija i sovershenstvovanija navyka. Jeksperimental’naja psihologija. 2022. V. 15. № 3. P. 222–223. (In Russian)
  5. Apanovich V.V., Yudakov K.S., Egorova P.I. Razrabotka principa analiza dinamiki psihofizicheskogo pokazatelja d’ s primeneniem metoda “skol’zjashhego okna”. Psikholo- gicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 5. P. 65–76. (In Russian)
  6. Vojtenko T.P. Sensornaja trenirovka kak faktor razvitija chuvstvitel’nosti: Dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. Moscow, 1989. (In Russian)
  7. Gusev A.N. Psihofizika sensornyh zadach: sistemno-dejatel’nostnyj analiz povedenija cheloveka v situacii neopredelennosti. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta; UMK “Psihologija”, 2004. (In Russian)
  8. Gusev A.N., Izmajlov Ch.A., Mihalevskaja M.B. Izmerenie v psihologii: obshhij psihologicheskij praktikum. 2-e izd. Moscow: Smysl, 1998. (In Russian)
  9. Zabrodin Ju.M., Pahomov A.P., Shapovalov V.I. Vzaimosvjaz’ jeffektivnosti obnaruzhenija signala / sbornik Psihofizika sensornyh i sensomotornyh processov. Ed. Ju.M. Zabrodin. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. (In Russian)
  10. Lisenkova V.P., Shpagonova N.G. Individual’nye i vozrastnye osobennosti vosprijatija vremeni vzroslymi ljud’mi. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. V. 42. № 5. P. 5–16. (In Russian)
  11. Pahomov A.P. Dinamichnost’ pokazatelej obnaruzhenija signalov v psihofizicheskih issledovanijah. Problemy inzhenernoj psihologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1979. P. 73–74. (In Russian)
  12. Skotnikova I.G. Problemy sub’ektnoj psihofiziki. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2008. (In Russian)
  13. Skotnikova I.G., Ivanov M.A. Jeksperimental’noe issledovanie vosprijatija ravenstva–razlichija dlitel’nostej. Issledovanija po kognitivnoj psihologii. Ed. E.A. Sergienko. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2004. P. 94–120. (In Russian)
  14. Skotnikova I.G., Shendjapin V.M., Sadov V.A., Panova E.V., Zhurkina E.V. Sootnoshenie uverennosti v reshe- nii s ego pravil’nost’ju, latentnost’ju i harakteristikami sensornoj zadachi. Jeksperimental’nyj metod v strukture psihologicheskogo znanija. Ed. V.A. Barabanshhikov. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”. 2012. P. 123–128. (In Russian)
  15. Shapkin S.A., Dikaja L.G. Dejatel’nost’ v osobyh uslovijah: komponentnyj analiz struktury i strategii adaptacii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1996. V. 17. № 1. P. 19–34. (In Russian)
  16. Shvyrkov V.B. Vvedenie v ob#ektivnuju psihologiju. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 1995. (In Russian)
  17. Shendjapin V.M., Skotnikova I.G. Modelirovanie prinja- tija reshenija i uverennosti v sensornyhzadachah. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2015. (In Russian)
  18. Yudakov K.S., Gladilin D.L., Apanovich V.V., Aramyan E.A., Alexandrov Ju.I. Opisanie tipichnyh komponentov SSP, projavljajushhihsja pri reshenii zadachi razlichenija korotkih intervalov vremeni. Jeksperimental’naja psihologija. 2025. V. 18. № 2. In print. (In Russian)
  19. Broadbent D.E., Gregory M. Vigilance considered as a statistical decision. British Journal of Psychology. 1963. № 54. P. 309–323.
  20. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
  21. Krueger L.I. A theory of perceptual matching. Psycholo- gical Review. 1978. V. 5. P. 278–304.
  22. Luce R.D. Response times. Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press. Oxford, 1986.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Description of one sample.

Жүктеу (92KB)
3. Fig. 2. Examples of variability of the d’ indicator during the experiment in study participants from different groups. Note. The abscissa shows the averaging window number, and the ordinate shows the d’ indicator values.

Жүктеу (327KB)
4. Fig. 3. Dynamics of the β indicator in participants from different groups.

Жүктеу (214KB)
5. Fig. 4. Average response time values for different response categories. Average response time values for each category were compared pairwise using the Wilcoxon test. Significant differences were noted at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.

Жүктеу (168KB)

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025