Bioglass 45S5 doped with Bi2O3 for medical use

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Bioglass 45S5 was doped with bismuth oxide in concentrations up to 40 wt.%. The amorphous nature of the synthesized glasses was confirmed by X-ray phase analysis. The influence of Bi2O3 on the properties of bioglass was studied. In a series of samples containing from 0 to 40 wt.% bismuth oxide, their characteristics change as follows: the pH values of the model medium during glass leaching decrease from 7.84 to 7.46; radiopacity increases from 1150 HU to values exceeding 11000 HU; chemical degradation drops from 1.299% to 0.424%; bioactivity decreases in the range of 0 – 10 wt.% and is absent in the range of 20–40 wt.% Bi2O3. Glasses containing up to 10 wt.% Bi2O3 can find application in reconstructive surgery. They have radiopaque and bioactive properties. Glasses containing 20–40 wt.% Bi2O3 have high radiopacity, chemical resistance, and a slight effect on the pH of the medium when dissolved. They may be promising as radiomodifiers in the treatment of malignant neoplasms using radiation therapy.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

D. Grishchenko

Institute of Chemistry, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: grishchenko@ich.dvo.ru
Ресей, Vladivostok, 690022

М. Medkov

Institute of Chemistry, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: grishchenko@ich.dvo.ru
Ресей, Vladivostok, 690022

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Hench L.L. // J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Med. 2006. V. 17. P. 967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z
  2. Miguez-Pacheco V., Hench L.L., Boccaccini A.R. // Acta Biomater. 2015. V. 13. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.004
  3. Mazzoni E., Iaquinta M.-R., Lanzillotti C. et al. // Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021. V. 9. P. 613787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.613787
  4. Wang R., Li H., Sun H. // Encyclopedia of Environmental Health. 2019. P. 415. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11870-6
  5. Shahbazi‐Gahrouei D., Choghazardi Y., Kazemzadeh A. et al. // IET Nanobiotechnol. 2023. V. 17. P. 302. https://doi.org/10.1049/nbt2.12134
  6. Thomas F., Bialek B., Hensel R. // J. Clin. Toxicol. 2011. V. 3. P. 4. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0495.S3-004
  7. Pazarçeviren A.E., Tahmasebifar A., Tezcaner A. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2018. V. 44. P. 3791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.164
  8. Mohn D., Zehnder M., Imfeld T., Stark W.J. // Int. Endod. J. 2010. V. 43. P. 210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01660.x
  9. Prasad S.S, Adarsh T., Anand A. et al. // J. Mater. Res. 2018. V. 33. P. 178. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.442
  10. Wang L., Long N.J., Li L. et al. // Light Sci. Appl. 2018. V. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-018-0007-z
  11. Du J., Ding H., Fu S. et al. // Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Sec. Nanobiotechnology. 2023. V. 10. P. 1098923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1098923
  12. Khatua C., Bodhak S., Kundu B., Balla V.K. // Materialia. 2018. V. 4. P. 361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2018.10.014
  13. Heid S., Stoessel P.R., Tauböck T.T. et al. // Biomed Glass. 2016. V. 2. P. 29. https://doi.org/10.1515/bglass-2016-0004/html
  14. Pazarçeviren A.E., Evis Z., Keskin D., Tezcaner A. // Biomed Mater. 2019. V. 14. P. 035018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ab007b
  15. Kokubo T., Takadama H. // Biomaterials. 2006. V. 27. P. 2907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017
  16. Prasad S.S., Ratha I., Adarsh T. et al. // J. Mater. Res. 2018. V. 33. P. 178. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.442
  17. Rabiee M., Nazparvar N., Azizian M. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2015. V. 41. P. 7241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.140
  18. Misch C.E. // Int. J. Oral Implantol. 1990. V. 6. P. 23.
  19. Łaczka M., Stoch L., Górecki J. // J. Alloys Compd. 1992. V. 186. P. 279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8388(92)90015-2
  20. Плотникова О.С., Грищенко Д.Н., Медков М.А. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 9. С. 1219. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22090094
  21. Смагулова З.Ш., Макарушко С.Г., Садыкова Х.М. и др. // Здоровье. Медицинская экология. М.: Наука, 2009. Т. 39–40. С. 173.
  22. Silver I.A., Deas J., Erecińska M. // Biomaterials. 2001. V. 22. P. 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00173-3
  23. Cerruti M., Greenspan D., Powers K. // Biomaterials. 2005. V. 26. P. 1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.009

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Diffraction pattern of a glass sample containing 40 wt.% Bi2O3

Жүктеу (48KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Photographs of samples doped with Bi2O3, wt. %: 5 (a), 10 (b), 20 (c), 40 (d)

Жүктеу (224KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Energy dispersive spectra of glasses doped with Bi2O3, wt. %: 5 (a), 10 (b), 20 (c), 40 (d)

Жүктеу (435KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Micrograph (a) and energy dispersive spectrum (b) of glass containing 5 wt.% Bi2O3 after being in SBF solution for 7 days.

Жүктеу (394KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Micrograph (a) and energy dispersive spectrum (b) of glass containing 5 wt.% Bi2O3 after being in SBF solution for 15 days.

Жүктеу (418KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Micrograph (a) and energy dispersive spectrum (b) of glass containing 10 wt.% Bi2O3 after being in SBF solution for 15 days.

Жүктеу (505KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. pH values ​​of the model solution during degradation of Bioglass 45S5 glass doped with Bi2O3, wt. %: 0 (1), 5 (2), 10 (3), 20 (4), 40 (5)

Жүктеу (78KB)
Метадеректер
9. Fig. 8. Dependence of pH values ​​on chemical degradation of the sample in a model Tris solution

Жүктеу (43KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024