Conversion of dimethyl ether to light olefins on Rh-Mg/HZSM-5: role of Rh as a modifier

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The influence of the second modifying metal (Rh) on the acid and catalytic properties of Mg/HZSM-5 in conversion of dimethyl ether to light olefins and the state of active components (Mg, Rh) on the zeolite surface are studied. It is shown that when it is introduced into Mg/HZSM-5, rhodium significantly increases stability of the catalyst operation while maintaining the selectivity for light olefins at the level of 75 wt. %. It is found that various oxocationic or oxide forms of magnesium are formed on the zeolite surface in the monometallic sample of Mg/HZSM-5, and introduction of rhodium contributes to stabilization of magnesium mainly in the form of Mg2+ cations while the strength of Lewis acid properties of magnesium cations decreases, which all together makes catalyst deactivation slow down.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

T. Batova

A. V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: batova.ti@ips.ac.ru
Ресей, Moscow

T. Obukhova

A. V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: batova.ti@ips.ac.ru
Ресей, Moscow

N. Kolesnichenko

A. V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: batova.ti@ips.ac.ru
Ресей, Moscow

M. Shilina

M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: batova.ti@ips.ac.ru
Ресей, Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Хаджиев С.Н., Колесниченко Н.В., Горяинова Т.И. и др. Катализатор и способ синтеза олефинов из диметилового эфира в его присутствии // Патент РФ № 2445158 С2.2012. Бюл. № 8.
  2. Kolesnichenko N.V., Ezhova N.N., Snatenkova Yu.M. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2020. V. 89. № 2. P. 191. https://doi.org/10.1070/RCR4900 [Колесниченко Н.В., Ежова Н.Н., Снатенкова Ю.М. // Успехи химии. 2020. Т. 89. № 2. С. 191. https://doi.org/10.1070/RCR4900]
  3. Колесникова Е.Е., Обухова Т.К., Колесниченко Н.В. и др. // Нефтехимия. 2018. Т. 58. № 5. С. 573. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0028242118050209 [Kolesnikova E.E., Obukhova T.K., Kolesnichenko N.V. et. al. // Petrol. Chemistry. 2018. V. 58. № 10. P. 863. https:// doi.org/10.1134/S0965544118100201]
  4. Батова Т.И., Обухова Т.К., Колесниченко Н.В. и др. // Нефтехимия. 2019. Т. 59. № 5. С. 569. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0028242119050034 [Batova T.I., Obukhova T.K., Kolesnichenko N.V. et. al. // Ibid. 2019. V. 59. № 9. P. 1017. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544119090032]
  5. Schultz H. // Catal. Today. 2010. V. 154. I. 3–4. Р. 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.05.012
  6. Lunsford J.H. // Catal. Today. 2000. V. 63. № 2–4. Р. 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00456-9
  7. Xu Y., Bao X., Lin L. // J. Catal. 2003. V. 216. № 1–2. Р. 386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021–9517(02)00124–0
  8. Ezhova N.N., Kolesnichenko N.V., Batova T.I. // Petrol. Chemistry. 2020. V. 60. № 4. P. 459. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544120040064
  9. Kolesnichenko N.V., Khivrich Е.N., Obukhova T.K. et. al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020. V. 298. 110087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110087
  10. Bakare I.A., Muraza O., Sanhoob M.A. et. al. // Fuel. 2018. V. 211. P. 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.117
  11. Khanmohammadi M., Amani Sh., Garmarudi A. Bagheri et. al. // Chin. J. Catal. 2016. V. 37. № 3. P. 325. https://doi.org 10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61031-2
  12. Zhang J., Zhu X., Zhang S. et. al. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019. V. 9. P. 316. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CY02189A
  13. Zhang J., Qian W., Kong C. et. al. // ACS Catal. 2015. V. 5. P. 2982. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b00192
  14. Zhang J., Zhu X., Wang G. et. al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2017. V. 327. P. 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.114
  15. Колесниченко Н.В., Колесникова Е.Е., Обухова Т.К. и др. // Нефтехимия. 2018. Т. 58. № 6. С. 665. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0028242118060059 [Kolesnichenko N.V., Kolesnikova E.E., Obukhova T.K. et. al. // Petrol. Chemistry. 2018. V. 58. № 12. P. 1013. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544118120058]
  16. Hou Y., Nagamatsu Sh., Asakura K. et. al. // Commun. Chem. 2018. V. 1. P. 41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-018-0044-9
  17. Reule Allen A.C., Semagina N. // ACS Catal. 2016. V 6. № 8. P. 4972. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b01464
  18. Martin O., Mondelli C., Curulla-Ferre D. et. al. // ACS Catal. 2015. V. 5. № 9. P. 5607. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SE01172J
  19. Колесниченко Н.В., Ежова Н.Н., Яшина О.В. // Нефтехимия. 2016. Т. 56. № 6. С. 607. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0028242116060113 [Kolesnichenko N.V., Ezhova N.N., Yashina O.V. // Petrol. Chemistry. 2016. V. 56. № 9. P. 827. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544116090115]
  20. Bondarenko G.N., Rodionov A.S., Kolesnichenko N.V., et al. // Catal. Letters. 2021. V. 151. P. 1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-020-03399-2
  21. Chernyshov A., Veligzhanin A., Zubavichus Y. // Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A. 2009. V. 603. P. 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.12.167
  22. Trofimova N., Veligzhanin A., Murzin V., et al. // Ross. Nanotechnol. 2013. V. 8. P. 396. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078013030191
  23. Ravel B., Newville M. // J. Synchrotron. Rad. 2005. V. 12. P. 537 https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049505012719
  24. Newille M. // Synchrotron. 2001. V. 8. 322. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049500016964
  25. Batova T.I., Stashenko A.N., Obukhova T.K., et al. // Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2023. T.366.112953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112953
  26. Kolesnichenko N.V., Batova T.I., Stashenko A.N., et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022. Т. 344. 112239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112239
  27. Шилина М.И., Обухова Т.К., Батова Т.И. и др. // Журн. физ. химии. 2023. Т. 97. № 7. С. 944. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453723070269 [Shilina M.I., Obukhova T.K., Batova T.I., et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2023. V. 97. № 7. P. 1387. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024423070269]
  28. Bulanek R., Voleska I., Ivanova E., et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009. V. 113. № 25. P. 11066. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp901575p
  29. Sun K., Su W., Fan F., et al. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2008. V. 112. P. 1352. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp709635f
  30. Voleská I., Nachtigall P., Ivanova E., et al. // Catal. Today. 2015. V. 243. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.07.029
  31. Arean C.O., Nachtigallova D., Nachtigall P., et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007. V. 9. P. 1421. https://doi.org/10.1039/b615535a
  32. Davydov A. Molecular Spectroscopy of Oxide Catalyst Surfaces. Chichester. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2003. 668 p.
  33. Шилина М.И, Удалова О.В., Невская С.М. // Кинетика и катализ. 2013. Т. 54. № 6. С. 731. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0453881113060117 [Shilina M.I., Nevskaya S.M., Udalova O.V. // Kinetics and Catalysis. 2013. V. 54. № 6. P. 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0023158413060116]
  34. Osuga R., Saikhantsetseg B., Yasuda S., et al. // Chem. Commun. 2020. V. 56. P. 5913. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC02284E
  35. Ivanova E., Mihaylov M., Thibault-Starzyk F., et al. // J. Catal. 2005. V. 236. P. 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2005.09.017
  36. Hadjiivanov K., Ivanova E., Dimitrov L., et al. // J. Molec. Struct. 2003. V. 661–662. P. 459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2003.09.007
  37. Spoto G., Gribov E.N., Ricchiardi G., et al. // Prog. Surf. Sci. 2004. V. 76. P. 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2004.05.014
  38. Larin A.V., Rybakov A.A., Zhidomirov G.M., et al. // J. Catal. 2011. V. 281. P. 212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.05.002
  39. Shilina M.I., Rostovshchikova T.N., Nikolaev S.A., et al. // Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2019. V. 223. P. 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.11.005
  40. Yarulina I., De Wispelaere K., Bailleul S., et al. // Nature Chem. 2018. V. 10. P. 804. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0081-0

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Effect of modifying Mg/HZ with rhodium on the stability of the catalyst (a) and the yield of target products in 4 h (b) in the conversion of DME to lower olefins; α is the conversion, C is the yield of lower olefins.

Жүктеу (167KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Temperature-programmed desorption curves of ammonia for Rh/HZ, Mg/HZ and Rh-Mg/HZ; v is the rate of ammonia desorption.

Жүктеу (99KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. XANES (a) and EXAFS (b) spectra at the K-edge of Rh catalysts Rh/HZ and Rh-Mg/HZ.

Жүктеу (138KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. IRDO spectra of adsorbed CO on Mg/HZ (a) and Rh-Mg/HZ (b) at equilibrium pressures of 5 (1), 10 Torr (2) and after evacuation to 0.05 Torr (3), k is the wave number.

Жүктеу (197KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Difference IRDO spectra of CO adsorbed on Mg/HZ and Rh-Mg/HZ at pressures of 5 (a) and 0.05 Torr (b). The spectra* were obtained by subtracting the spectra of the initial HZ zeolite from the spectra of these samples (Fig. 4, curves 1 and 3).

Жүктеу (257KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025