Fundamental bases for the use of silk fibroin-based bioresorbable microvehicles as an example of skin regeneration in therapeutic practice

Abstract

Aim. To assess whether silk fibroin-based microvehicles (MVs) may be used to grow fibroblasts (FBs) and keratinocytes (KCs), key cellular components in skin regeneration after injury. Materials and methods. Cryogrinding was applied to derive MVs from fibroin-based and fibroin- and 30% gelatin-containing composite matrices. To examine the structure of the matrices and MVs, confocal microscopy was used to conjugate the polymer with the dye tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate. Microparticle size distribution was estimated by granulometric analysis. 3T3 mouse FBs and cultured primary mouse KCs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) were used to study whether fibroin-based MVs might be suitable for growing the cells involved in skin regeneration. KC growth was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy from cellular GFP expression. The proliferation rate of FBs and KCs was estimated by a MTT assay. Results. There were two derived MV types: fibroin-based and fibroin and 30% gelatin-containing composite ones. On day 1, 3T3 mouse FBs on the fibroin-based gelatin-free MVs actively proliferated and the presence of gelatin in MVs diminished the proliferation of these cells. Fibroin-based MVs were shown to be suitable for the effective in vitro growth of KCs expressing cytokeratins 5 and 14, the major markers of KCs in the basal layer. Gelatin did not give rise to accelerated KC growth. The investigation has demonstrated that is possible to regulate FB proliferation on MVs, which is of great importance in delivering the cells into the site of injury since intensive proliferation of FBs may lead to the development of fibrosis and the formation of scar tissue. Balanced FB growth is essential to the creation of optimal conditions for KC growth in composite tissue-engineering constructions. Conclusion. The use of fibroin-based MVs is promising for the design of novel therapeutic materials and injectable cell therapy for different diseases.

References

  1. You HJ, Han SK. Cell therapy for wound healing. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(3):311-319. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.3.311.
  2. Petrof G, Abdul-Wahab A, McGrath JA. Cell therapy in dermatology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4(6):pii:a015156. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015156.
  3. Bonartsev A, Yakovlev S, Boskhomdzhiev A, Zharkova I, Bagrov D, Myshkina V, Mahina T, Kharitonova E, Samsonova O, Zernov A, Zhuikov V, Efremov Y, Voinova V, Bonartseva G, Shaitan K. The terpolymer produced by Azotobacter chroococcum 7B: effect of surface properties on cell attachment. PLoSOne. 2013;8(2): e57200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057200.
  4. Moisenovich MM, Pustovalova OL, Arhipova AY, Vasiljeva TV, Sokolova OS, Bogush VG, Debabov VG, Sevastianov VI, Kirpichnikov MP, Agapov II. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility studies of a recombinant analogue of spidroin 1 scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;96(1):125-131. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32968.
  5. Moisenovich MM, Pustovalova OL, Shackelford J, Vasiljeva TV, Druzhinina TV, Kamenchuk YA, Guzeev VV, Sokolova OS, Bogush VG, Debabov VG, Kirpichnikov MP, Agapov II. Tissue regeneration in vivo within recombinant spidroin 1 scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2012;33(15):3887-3898. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.013.
  6. Orlova AA, Kotlyarova MS, Lavrenov VS, Volkova SV, Arkhipova AY. Relationship between gelatin concentrations in silk fibroin-based composite scaffolds and adhesion and proliferation of mouse embryo fibroblasts. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2014;158(1):88-91. doi: 10.1007/s10517-014-2699-2.
  7. Moisenovich MM, Arkhipova AY, Orlova AA et al. Composite Scaffolds Containing Silk Fibroin, Gelatin, and Hydroxyapatite for Bone Tissue Regeneration and 3D Cell Culturing. Acta Naturae. 2014;6(1):96-101.
  8. Guan G, Zuo B, Li M, Wu Z, Li Y, Wang L. Promoted dermis healing from full-thickness skin defect by porous silk fibroin scaffolds (PSFSs). Biomed Mater Eng. 2010;20(5):295-308. doi: 10.3233/bme-2010-0643.
  9. Kanokpanont S, Ratanavaraporn J, Aramwit P. An innovative bi-layered wound dressing made of silk and gelatin for accelerated wound healing. Int J Pharm. 2012;436(1-2):141-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.06.046.
  10. Wang Y, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL. Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2006;27(36):6064-6082. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.008.
  11. Min BM, Kim SH, Nam YS, Lee TS, Park W. Electrospinning of chitin nanofibers: degradation behavior and cellular response to normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 2006;27(21):3934-3944. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.016.
  12. Mei N, Chen G, Zhou P, Chen X, Shao ZZ, Pan LF, Wu CG. Biocompatibility of Poly(e-caprolactone) Scaffold Modified by Chitosan — The Fibroblasts Proliferation in vitro. J Biomater Appl. 2005;19(4):323-339. doi: 10.1177/0885328205048630.
  13. Sun LY, Lin SZ, Li YS, Harn HJ, Chiou TW. Functional cells cultured on microcarriers for use in regenerative medicine research. Cell Transplant. 2011;20(1):49-62. doi: 10.3727/096368910x532792.
  14. Chen AK, Reuveny S, Oh SK. Application of human mesenchymal and pluripotent stem cell microcarrier cultures in cellular therapy: achievements and future direction. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(7): 1032-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.03.006.
  15. Presland RB, Dale BA. Epithelial structural proteins of the skin and oral cavity: function in health and disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000;11(4):383-408. doi: 10.1177/10454411000110040101.
  16. Huang Y, Onyeri S, Siewe M, Moshfeghian A, Madihally SV. In vitro characterization of chitosan-gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26(36):7616-7627. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.036.
  17. Архипова А.Ю., Котлярова М.С., Новичкова С.Г., Агапова О.И., Куликов Д.А., Куликов А.В., Друцкая М.С., Агапов И.И., Мойсенович М.М. Новые биорезорбируемые микроносители на основе фиброина шелка. БЭБиМ. 2015;160(10): 497-501.
  18. Fathke C, Wilson L, Hutter J, Kapoor V, Smith A, Hocking A, Isik F. Contribution of bone marrow-derived cells to skin: collagen deposition and wound repair. Stem Cells. 2004;22(5):812-822. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-5-812.
  19. Mannik J, Alzayady K, Ghazizadeh S. Regeneration of multilineage skin epithelia by differentiated keratinocytes. JInvest Dermatol. 2010;130(2):388-397. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.244.
  20. Lugo LM, Andreadis ST. Vascularization of the dermal support enhances wound re-epithelialization by in situ delivery of epidermal keratinocytes. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17(5-6):665-675. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0125.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 

Address of the Editorial Office:

  • Alabyan Street, 13/1, Moscow, 127055, Russian Federation

Correspondence address:

  • Alabyan Street, 13/1, Moscow, 127055, Russian Federation

Managing Editor:

  • Tel.: +7 (926) 905-41-26
  • E-mail: e.gorbacheva@ter-arkhiv.ru

 

© 2018-2021 "Consilium Medicum" Publishing house


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies