Effectiveness of bortezomib and bortezomib-containing programs FOR the treatment of recurrent and resistant multiple myeloma


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of bortezomib and bortezomib-containing treatment programs in the therapy of resistant and recurrent multiple myeloma (MM) within a large unicenter study in real clinical practice conditions.
Subjects and methods. The study enrolled 101 patients (48 men and 53 women aged 34 to 77 years, mean age 54 years) with resistant and recurrent MM. According to the types of paraprotein (PIg), the authors revealed the usual distribution: G, 60.7%; A, 23.8%; BJ, 13%; M, 1.15%; D, 1.15%. The PIg κ/λ light chain ratio was 1.7. The complicated course of the disease was noted in 50.4% of the patients. The patients were randomized into 4 treatment groups: V1 - velcade 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle; V2 - velcade 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, melphalan 20 mg orally on day 2 of a 28-day cycle; V3 - velcade 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, melphalan 9 mg/m2 orally for 4 days, prednisolone 60 mg/m2 orally for 4 days of a 42-day cycle; V4 - velcade 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, melphalan 9 mg/m2 orally for 4 days, prednisolone 60 mg/m2 orally for 4 days, cyclophosphanum, 250 mg/m2 intravenously dropwise on days 1 to 7 of a 60-day cycle. An average of 6.5 induction treatment cycles was performed.
Results. Amongst the 27 patients receiving bortezomib therapy (V1), an objective response to therapy was obtained in 70.3%, including a complete response (CR) in 18.5%, a near-complete response (NCR) in 14.8%, and a partial response (PR) in 37%. When a combination of melphalan and bortezomib (VM; V2) was used, 22 patients achieved CR, NCR, and PR, which were equal to 9, 13, and 45.4%, respectively. In the group of 20 patients on the triple combination (VMP; V3), the amount of CR and PR was 90%. The use of the quadruple combination regimen (V4; VMCP) yielded an objective response (CR + NCR + PR) in 63.2% of the 32 patients, which did not virtually differ from other programs other than V3. However, the amount of CR +NCR (43.6%) was more than that in other groups. When all these programs were implemented, clinically significant myelotoxicity and grades 3 and 4 polyneuropathy were not seen. When the bortezomib-containing programs were applied, the median overall survival from the moment of diagnosis was 103 months.
Conclusion. Bortezomib in the monotherapy and multidrug therapy for resistant and recurrent MM shows immediate and long-term benefits and a low toxicity.

About the authors

T A Mitina

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

A K Golenkov

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

E V Katayeva

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

T D Lutskaya

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

E V Trifonona

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

E F Klinushkina

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

References

  1. Michallet M., Sobh M., Le Q. H. et al. Long-term follow-up of multiple myeloma patients treated by velcade. Clinical lymphoma and myeloma IMW: Abstracts Book. Washington, 2009. 7-8.
  2. Yong K., Percival F., Anger M. et al. Outcomes in relapsed multiple myeloma in the Unated Kingdom. Clinical lymphoma and myeloma IMW: Abstracts Book 2009. 31.
  3. Percy L. A., Rabin N., Cheesman S. et al. Bortezomib in real patients: a single-centre experience. Clinical lymphoma and myeloma IMW: Abstracts Book 2009. 33.
  4. Michael J. R., Belch A., Prince M. et al. Preliminary safety and efficacy results from an international phase III study for expanded access to bortezomib in 624 patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2006; 108 (11): 1007.
  5. Blade J., Samson D., Reece D. et al. Criteria for evaluating disease respons and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant: myeloma subcommittee of the EBMT. Br. J. Haematol. 1998; 102: 1115-1123.
  6. Niesniky R., Richardson P. G., Sonnefeld P. et al. Relation ship between quality of response to bortezomib and clinical benefit in multiple myeloma in the APEX and Summit studies. Blood 2006; 108 (11): 1007a.
  7. Richardson P. G., Sonneveld P., Schuster M. W. et al. Bortezomib to demonstrate superior efficacy compared with high-dose dexametasone in relapsed multiple myeloma: updated resalts if the APEX trial. Blood 2005; 106: 715a.
  8. Popat R., Oakervee H. E., Foot N. et al. A phase I/II study of bortezomib and low dose intravenous melphalan (BM)for relapsed multiple myeloma. Hematologica 2009; 94 (suppl. 2): 156.
  9. Palumbo A., Bringen S., Rossi D. et al. Bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide (VMPT) versus bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) in eldery new diagnosed myeloma patients: A prospective, randomized, phase III study. Hematologica 2009; 94 (suppl. 2): 190.
  10. Tothova E., Kafkova A., Stecova N. et al. Combination of international stading system and cytogenetics can predict poor prognosis in multiple myeloma after HD-chemotherapy and autologeus stem cell transplantation. Hematologica 2009; 94 (suppl. 2): 386.
  11. Lao Z. T., Wee W. C. N., Lee Y. S. et al. The impact of frontline treatment on survival outcomes in multiple myeloma: the SGH experience. Hematologica 2009; 94 (suppl. 2): 386.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2010 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 

Address of the Editorial Office:

  • Alabyan Street, 13/1, Moscow, 127055, Russian Federation

Correspondence address:

  • Alabyan Street, 13/1, Moscow, 127055, Russian Federation

Managing Editor:

  • Tel.: +7 (926) 905-41-26
  • E-mail: e.gorbacheva@ter-arkhiv.ru

 

© 2018-2021 "Consilium Medicum" Publishing house


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies