Multislice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: current opportunities and perspectives


Cite item

Full Text

References

  1. Achenbach S. et al. Top 10 indications for coronary CTA. Appl. Radiol. 2006; 35 (Suppl. 12): 22-31.
  2. Синицын В. Е., Воронов Д. А., Морозов С. П. Степень кальциноза коронарных артерий как прогностический фактор осложнений сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний без клинических проявлений: результаты метаанализа. Тер. арх. 2006; 9: 22-27.
  3. Терновой С. К., Синицын В. Е., Гагарина Н. В. Неинвазивная диагностика атеросклероза и кальциноза коронарных артерий. М.: Атмосфера; 2003.
  4. Синицын В. Е., Устюжанин Д. В. КТ-ангиография коронарных артерий. Кардиология 2006; 1: 20-25.
  5. Ehara M., Surmely J. F., Kawai M. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: Comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ. J. 2006; 70: 564-571.
  6. Leschka S. et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur. Heart J. 2005; 26: 1482-1487.
  7. Wann S. MACC, cardiac CT for risk stratification. Appl. Radiol. 2006; 12: 41-44.
  8. Gaspar T., Halon R., Rubinshtein N. Clinical applications and future trends in cardial CTA. Eur. Radiol. 2005; 15 (suppl. 14): 10-14.
  9. Jacobs J. E. How to perform coronary CTA: A to Z. Appl. Radiol. 2006; 12: 10-17.
  10. Stein P. D., Yaekoub A. Y., Matta F., Sostman H. D. 64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am. J. Med. 2008; 121(8): 715-725.
  11. Dewey M. et al. Head-to head comparison of multislice computed tomography angiography and exercise electrocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J. 2007; 28(20): 2485-2490.
  12. Ravipati G., Aronow W. S. et al. Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of stress testing versus 64-multislice coronary computed tomography angiography in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease diagnosed by coronary angiography. Am. J. Cardiol. 2008; 101(6): 774-775.
  13. Schlosser T., Konorza T., Hunold P. et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1224-1229.
  14. Chabbert V., Carrie D., Bennaceur M. et al. Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Eur. Radiol. 2007; 17: 1452-1463.
  15. Cademartiri F., Marano R., Runza G. et al. Ncn-invasive assessment of coronary stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience. Radiol. Med. (Torino) 2005; 109(5-6): 500-507.
  16. Mahnken A. H., Buecker A., Wildberger J. E. et al. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artefact evaluation. Invest. Radiol. 2003; 39: 27-33.
  17. Schijf J. D., Bax J. J., Jukema J. W. et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am. J. Cardiol. 2004; 94: 427-430.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2009 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 

Address of the Editorial Office:

  • Alabyan Street, 13/1, Moscow, 127055, Russian Federation

Correspondence address:

  • Alabyan Street, 13/1, Moscow, 127055, Russian Federation

Managing Editor:

  • Tel.: +7 (926) 905-41-26
  • E-mail: e.gorbacheva@ter-arkhiv.ru

 

 © 2018-2021 "Consilium Medicum" Publishing house


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies