Impacts of urbanization on humus forms in inner-city forests of natural origin: a case study of Yekaterinburg

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Within Yekaterinburg (Middle Urals, Russia), remnants of old-growth pine forests of natural origin have been preserved. In these forests, traditional urban management practices (such as landscape redevelopment, tree felling and planting, grass cutting, mechanical soil disturbance, and forest litter removal) are not applied. The case of Yekaterinburg creates a unique opportunity to study the impact of urbanization in its “pure” form. Our study analyzed humus forms, i.e., types of morphological structure of topsoils, which are determined by the composition and abundance of decomposers (primarily macro- and mesofauna). We compared humus forms in urban forests within the city to those in their suburban counterparts. The identification of humus forms was based on the European morpho-functional classification of humus systems and forms. The direction of changes in humus forms depends on the balance of various urbanization factors at different scales. These factors include city-wide influences (thermal pollution, eutrophication from atmospheric deposition and other sources, invasion of deciduous trees and shrubs into coniferous forests) and local factor (trampling due to recreational activities). With low recreational impact, the spectrum of humus forms shifts towards more zoogenic variants, with Oligomull and Mesomull replacing Dysmull. In contrast, high recreational pressure leads to a shift in the spectrum towards less active humus forms. In this case, Hemimoder, Eumoder, Hemimor, Humimor, and Eumor replace Dysmull. These transformation pathways can have opposite consequences for the carbon cycle under urbanization: in the first case, carbon is primarily accumulated in the organic-mineral horizons, while in the second case, it is deposited in the forest litter.

About the authors

I. N. Korkina

Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ev@ipae.uran.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6268-2604
Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg, 620144

T. Yu. Gabershtein

Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ev@ipae.uran.ru
Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg, 620144

E. L. Vorobeichik

Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: ev@ipae.uran.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9191-1296
Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg, 620144

References

  1. Беднова О.В., Кузнецов В.А., Тарасова Н.П. Эвтрофирование экосистемы городского леса: причины и последствия // Доклады РАН. 2018. Т. 478. № 3. С. 346–351. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869565218030210
  2. Бергман И.Е., Воробейчик Е.Л., Ермаков А.И. Влияние условий мегаполиса на трофическую активность почвенных сапрофагов в городских лесах // Почвоведение. 2017. № 1. С. 117–129. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032180X17010026
  3. Буйволова А.Ю., Рахлеева А.А., Буйволов Ю.А., Быкова Е.П. Структура комплексов мезофауны почв лесопарковой зоны Москвы и Приокско-Террасного биосферного заповедника // Почвоведение. 2016. № 12. С. 1475–1484. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032180X16120042
  4. Веселкин Д.В., Галако В.А., Власенко В.Э., Шавнин С.А., Воробейчик Е.Л. Сосновые насаждения в крупном промышленном городе: сопряженный анализ параметров организменного и ценотического уровней // Сиб. эколог. журн. 2015. № 2. С. 301–309.
  5. Веселкин Д.В., Кайгородова С.Ю. Связь между агрохимическими свойствами почв урбанизированных лесов и строением эктомикориз сосны обыкновенной // Агрохимия. 2013. № 11. С. 54–62.
  6. Веселкин Д.В., Коржиневская А.А. Пространственные факторы адвентизации подлеска в лесопарках крупного города // Известия РАН. Сер. географическая. 2018. № 4. С. 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2587556618040167
  7. Веселкин Д.В., Коржиневская А.А., Подгаевская Е.Н. Краевой эффект для травяно-кустарничкового яруса урбанизированных южнотаежных лесов // Экология. 2018. № 6. С. 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0367059718060136
  8. Веселкин Д.В., Шавнин С.А., Воробейчик Е.Л., Галако В.А., Власенко В.Э. Краевые эффекты для сосновых древостоев в крупном городе // Экология. 2017. № 6. С. 405–412. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0367059717060014
  9. Воробейчик Е.Л. Естественное восстановление наземных экосистем после прекращения промышленного загрязнения. 1. Обзор современного состояния исследований // Экология. 2022. С. 3–41. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0367059722010115
  10. Горностаева А.А., Демежко Д.Ю., Хацкевич Б.Д. Временная изменчивость городского острова тепла Екатеринбурга // Известия Иркутского гос. ун-та. Сер. Науки о Земле. 2023. Т. 43. С. 3–18. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2023.43.3
  11. Ермаков А.И., Воробейчик Е.Л. Почвенная мезофауна лесных экосистем в условиях крупного промышленного города // Евразиатский энтомологический журнал. 2013. Т. 12. № 6. С. 519–528.
  12. Загрязнение почв Российской Федерации токсикантами промышленного происхождения в 2020 году. Обнинск: Тайфун, 2021. 128 с.
  13. Золотарев М.П., Бельская Е.А. Население беспозвоночных-герпетобионтов в крупном промышленном городе: разделение эффектов рекреации и урбанизации // Сиб. эколог. журн. 2015. № 1. С. 102–111.
  14. Золотарева Н.В., Подгаевская Е.Н., Шавнин С.А. Изменение структуры напочвенного покрова сосновых лесов в условиях крупного промышленного города // Изв. Оренбургского гос. аграрного ун-та. 2012. № 5(37). С. 218–221.
  15. Капустин В.Г. Физико-географическое районирование Свердловской области // География и современные проблемы естественнонаучного познания: Мат-лы конф. Екатеринбург, 2009. С. 11–24.
  16. Классификация и диагностика почв России. Смоленск: Ойкумена, 2004. 341 с.
  17. Колесников Б.П., Зубарева Р.С., Смолоногов Е.П. Лесорастительные условия и типы лесов Свердловской области: практическое руководство. Свердловск: УНЦ АН СССР, 1973. 174 с.
  18. Коркина И.Н., Воробейчик Е.Л. Индекс форм гумуса – перспективный инструмент для экологического мониторинга // Экология. 2016. № 6. С. 434–440. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0367059716060081
  19. Кузнецов В.А., Рыжова И.М., Стома Г.В. Изменение свойств почв лесопарков Москвы при высоком уровне рекреационной нагрузки // Почвоведение. 2017. № 10. С. 1270–1280. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032180X17100057
  20. Кузнецов В.А., Стома Г.В., Бодров К.С. Состояние сообщества мезопедобионтов в московских лесопарках как индикатор рекреационной нагрузки и формирования импактных зон вдоль тропинок // Вестник Моск. ун-та. Сер. 17, почвоведение. 2014. № 1. С. 44–52.
  21. Кукарских В.В., Дэви Н.М., Бубнов М.О., Комарова А.В., Агафонов Л.И. Городской остров тепла г. Екатеринбурга: есть ли влияние на радиальный прирост сосны обыкновенной? // Журнал Сибирского фед. ун-та. Сер. Биология. 2022. Т. 15. № 2. С. 264–278. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1389-0386
  22. Металлургические заводы Урала XVII–XX вв. Энциклопедия. Екатеринбург: Академкнига, 2001. 532 с.
  23. Семенюк О.В., Телеснина В.М., Богатырев Л.Г., Бенедиктова А.И. Использование особенностей структурно-функциональной организации подстилок для оценки интенсивности круговорота в городских насаждениях (на примере Москвы) // Почвоведение. 2021. № 5. С. 592–605. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032180X21050178
  24. Семенюк О.В., Телеснина В.М., Богатырев Л.Г., Земсков Ф.И. Подстилки городских насаждений как индикатор интенсивности биологического круговорота в условиях мегаполиса // Почвоведение. 2022. № 6. С. 673–686. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032180X22060119
  25. Сморкалов И.А., Воробейчик Е.Л. Влияние условий крупного промышленного города на почвенное дыхание лесных экосистем // Почвоведение. 2015. № 1. С. 118–126. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032180X15010141
  26. Строганова М.Н., Мягкова А.Д., Прокофьева Т.В. Городские почвы: генезис, классификация, функции // Почва, город, экология. М., 1997. С. 15–88.
  27. Стурман В.И. Природные и техногенные факторы загрязнения атмосферного воздуха российских городов // Вестн. Удмуртского ун-та. Сер. Биология. Науки о Земле. 2008. № 2. С. 15–29.
  28. Чертов О.Г. Определение типов гумуса лесных почв. Л.: ЛенНИИЛХ, 1974. 16 с.
  29. Чертов О.Г. Экология лесных земель (почвенно-экологическое исследование лесных местообитаний). Л.: Наука, 1981. 192 с.
  30. Чертов О.Г., Надпорожская М.А. Формы гумуса лесных почв: концепции и классификации // Почвоведение. 2018. № 10. С. 1202–1214. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032180X18100027
  31. Чертов О.Г., Надпорожская М.А., Паленова М.М., Припутина И.В. Эдафология в структуре почвоведения и экосистемной экологии // Russ. J. Ecosystem Ecol. 2018. Т. 3. № 3. https://doi.org/10.21685/2500-0578-2018-3-2
  32. Achilles F., Tischer A., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Heinze M., Reinhardt F., Makeschin F. et al. European beech leads to more bioactive humus forms but stronger mineral soil acidification as Norway spruce and Scots pine – Results of a repeated site assessment after 63 and 82 years of forest conversion in Central Germany // For. Ecol. Manage. 2020. P. 118769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118769
  33. Alban D.H., Berry E.C. Effects of earthworm invasion on morphology, carbon, and nitrogen of a forest soil // Appl. Soil Ecol. 1994. V. 1. № 3. P. 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0929-1393(94)90015-9
  34. Angst G., Potapov A., Joly F.-X., Angst Š., Frouz J., Ganault P., et al. Conceptualizing soil fauna effects on labile and stabilized soil organic matter // Nature Commun. 2024. V. 15. № 1. P. 5005. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49240-x
  35. Badía-Villas D., Girona-García A. Soil humus changes with elevation in Scots pine stands of the Moncayo Massif (NE Spain) // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018. V. 123. P. 617–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.07.017
  36. Bayranvand M., Kooch Y., Hosseini S.M., Alberti G. Humus forms in relation to altitude and forest type in the Northern mountainous regions of Iran // For. Ecol. Manage. 2017. V. 385. P. 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.035
  37. Bohlen P.J., Scheu S., Hale C.M., McLean M.A., Migge S., Groffman P.M., et al. Non-native invasive earthworms as agents of change in northern temperate forests // Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2004. V. 2. № 8. P. 427–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/3868431
  38. Bottinelli N., Capowiez Y., Ranger J. Slow recovery of earthworm populations after heavy traffic in two forest soils in northern France // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2014. V. 73. P. 130–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.08.017
  39. Bunting B.T., Lundberg J. The humus profile – concept, class and reality // Geoderma. 1987. V. 40. № 1. P. 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(87)90011-5
  40. Cassagne N., Bal-Serin M.-C., Gers C., Gauquelin T. Changes in humus properties and collembolan communities following the replanting of beech forests with spruce // Pedobiologia. 2004. V. 48. № 3. P. 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2004.01.004
  41. Chan K.Y., Barchia I. Soil compaction controls the abundance, biomass and distribution of earthworms in a single dairy farm in south-eastern Australia // Soil Till. Res. 2007. V. 94. № 1. P. 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.07.006
  42. De Pauw K., Depauw L., Cousins S.A.O., De Lombaerde E., Diekmann M., Frey D., et al. The urban heat island accelerates litter decomposition through microclimatic warming in temperate urban forests // Urban Ecosystems. 2024. V. 27. № 3. P. 909–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01486-x
  43. Eaton R.J., Barbercheck M., Buford M., Smith W. Effects of organic matter removal, soil compaction, and vegetation control on Collembolan populations // Pedobiologia. 2004. V. 48. № 2. P. 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2003.10.001
  44. Ferré C., Comolli R. Effects of Quercus rubra L. on soil properties and humus forms in 50-year-old and 80-year-old forest stands of Lombardy plain // Annals Forest Sci. 2020. V. 77. № 1. P. 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0893-0
  45. Fischer H., Bens O., Hüttl R. Veränderung von Humusform, –vorrat und –verteilung im Zuge von Waldumbau-Maßnahmen im Nordostdeutschen Tiefland // Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt. 2002. V. 121. № 6. P. 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0337.2002.02037.x
  46. Gentili R., Ferrè C., Cardarelli E., Montagnani C., Bogliani G., Citterio S., et al. Comparing negative impacts of Prunus serotina, Quercus rubra and Robinia pseudoacacia on native forest ecosystems // Forests. 2019. V. 10. № 10. P. 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10100842
  47. Hättenschwiler S., Tiunov A.V., Scheu S. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems // Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005. V. 36. P. 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932
  48. Jordan D., Li F., Ponder Jr. F., Berry E.C., Hubbard V.C., Kim K.Y. The effects of forest practices on earthworm populations and soil microbial biomass in a hardwood forest in Missouri // Appl. Soil Ecol. 1999. V. 13. № 1. P. 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(99)00017-7
  49. Klinka K., Krestov P., Fons J., Chourmouzis C. Towards a taxonomic classification of humus forms: third approximation // Scientia Silvica. 1997. V. 9. P. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0107268
  50. Korboulewsky N., Perez G., Chauvat M. How tree diversity affects soil fauna diversity: A review // Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016. V. 94. P. 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.024
  51. Korkina I.N., Vorobeichik E.L. Humus Index as an indicator of the topsoil response to the impacts of industrial pollution // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018. V. 123. P. 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.09.025
  52. Korkina I.N., Vorobeichik E.L. Non-typical degraded and regraded humus forms in metal-contaminated areas, or there and back again // Geoderma. 2021. V. 404. P. 115390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115390
  53. Kukarskih V.V., Devi N.M., Bubnov M.O., Komarova A.V., Agafonov L.I. Radial growth of Scots pine in urban and rural populations of Ekaterinburg megalopolis // Dendrochronologia. 2022. V. 74. P. 125974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2022.125974
  54. Lejoly J., Quideau S., Laganière J. Invasive earthworms affect soil morphological features and carbon stocks in boreal forests // Geoderma. 2021. V. 404. P. 115262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115262
  55. Melliger R.L., Rusterholz H.P., Baur B. Ecosystem functioning in cities: Combined effects of urbanisation and forest size on early-stage leaf litter decomposition of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) // Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. 2017. V. 28. P. 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.009
  56. Meyer S., Rusterholz H.-P., Salamon J.-A., Baur B. Leaf litter decomposition and litter fauna in urban forests: Effect of the degree of urbanisation and forest size // Pedobiologia. 2020. V. 78. P. 150609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2019.150609
  57. Müllerová V., Hejcman M., Hejcmanová P., Pavlů V. Effect of fertilizer application on Urtica dioica and its element concentrations in a cut grassland // Acta Oecol. 2014. V. 59. P. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2014.05.004
  58. Nikula S., Vapaavuori E., Manninen S. Urbanization-related changes in European aspen (Populus tremula L.): Leaf traits and litter decomposition // Environ. Pollut. 2010. V. 158. № 6. P. 2132–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.025
  59. Pižl V., Josens G. Earthworm communities along a gradient of urbanization // Environ. Pollut. 1995. V. 90. № 1. P. 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(94)00097-W
  60. Pižl V., Schlaghamerský J. The impact of pedestrian activity on soil annelids in urban greens // Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2007. V. 43. P. S68–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.004
  61. Ponge J.F., André J., Zackrisson O., Bernier N., Nilsson M.C., Gallet C. The forest regeneration puzzle: Biological mechanisms in humus layer and forest vegetation dynamics // Bioscience. 1998. V. 48. № 7. P. 523–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313314
  62. Ponge J.F., Chevalier R. Humus Index as an indicator of forest stand and soil properties // For. Ecol. Manage. 2006. V. 233. № 1. P. 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.022
  63. Ponge J.F., Chevalier R., Loussot P. Humus Index: An integrated tool for the assessment of forest floor and topsoil properties // Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002. V. 66. № 6. P. 1996–2001. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1996
  64. Pouyat R.V., McDonnell M.J., Pickett S.T.A. Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient // Urban Ecosystems. 1997. V. 1. № 2. P. 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018567326093
  65. Salmon S. Changes in humus forms, soil invertebrate communities and soil functioning with forest dynamics // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018. V. 123. P. 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.04.010
  66. Satchel J.E. Lumbricidae // Soil Biol. London, 1967. P. 259–322.
  67. Smetak K.M., Johnson-Maynard J.L., Lloyd J.E. Earthworm population density and diversity in different-aged urban systems // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2007. V. 37. № 1–2. P. 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.06.004
  68. Steinberg D.A., Pouyat R.V., Parmelee R.W., Groffman P.M. Earthworm abundance and nitrogen mineralization rates along an urban-rural land use gradient // Soil Biol. Biochem. 1997. V. 29. № 3–4. P. 427–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00043-0
  69. Suárez E.R., Fahey T.J., Yavitt J.B., Groffman P.M., Bohlen P.J. Patterns of litter disappearance in a northern hardwood forest invaded by exotic earthworms // Ecol. Appl. 2006. V. 16. № 1. P. 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0788
  70. Svirejeva-Hopkins A., Schellnhuber H.J. Urban expansion and its contribution to the regional carbon emissions: Using the model based on the population density distribution // Ecol. Model. 2008. V. 216. № 2. P. 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.03.023
  71. Tresch S., Frey D., Le Bayon R.-C., Zanetta A., Rasche F., Fliessbach A., et al. Litter decomposition driven by soil fauna, plant diversity and soil management in urban gardens // Sci. Total Environ. 2019. V. 658. P. 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.235
  72. Uvarov A.V., Tiunov A.V., Scheu S. Effects of seasonal and diurnal temperature fluctuations on population dynamics of two epigeic earthworm species in forest soil // Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011. V. 43. № 3. P. 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.023
  73. Vasenev V., Kuzyakov Y. Urban soils as hot spots of anthropogenic carbon accumulation: Review of stocks, mechanisms and driving factors // Land Degrad. Develop. 2018. V. 29. № 6. P. 1607–1622. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2944
  74. Vasenev V.I., Stoorvogel J.J., Vasenev I.I., Valentini R. How to map soil organic carbon stocks in highly urbanized regions? // Geoderma. 2014. V. 226-227. P. 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.03.007
  75. Veselkin D.V. Urbanization increases the range, but not the depth, of forest edge influences on Pinus sylvestris bark pH // Urban Forestry Urban Greening. 2023. V. 79. P. 127819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127819
  76. Veselkin D.V., Korzhinevskaya A.A., Podgaevskaya E.N. The edge effect on the herb–dwarf shrub layer of suburban anthropogenically fragmented southern taiga pine forests // Rus. J. Ecol. 2021. V. 52. № 6. P. 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106741362106014X
  77. Vorobeichik E.L., Bergman I.E. Modification of the bait-lamina test to estimate soil macrofauna and mesofauna feeding activity // Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023. V. 183. P. 109047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109047
  78. Vorobeichik E.L., Korkina I.N. A bizarre layer cake: Why soil animals recolonizing polluted areas shape atypical humus forms // Sci. Total Environ. 2023. V. 904. P. 166810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166810
  79. Wachendorf C., Frank T., Broll G., Beylich A., Milbert G. A concept for a consolidated humus form description – An updated version of German humus form systematics // Int. J. Plant Biol. 2023. V. 14. № 3. P. 658–686. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb14030050
  80. Wironen M., Moore T.R. Exotic earthworm invasion increases soil carbon and nitrogen in an old-growth forest in southern Quebec // Can. J. For. Res. 2006. V. 36. № 4. P. 845–854. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-016
  81. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Vienna: International Union of Soil Sciences, 2022. 234 p.
  82. Zanella A., Jabiol B., Ponge J.F., Sartori G., De Waal R., Van Delft B., et al. A European morpho-functional classification of humus forms // Geoderma. 2011. V. 164. № 3–4. P. 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.05.016
  83. Zanella A., Ponge J.-F., de Waal R., Ferronato C., De Nobili M., Juilleret J. Humusica 1, article 3: Essential bases – Quick look at the classification // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018. V. 122. P. 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.05.025
  84. Zanella A., Ponge J.-F., Jabiol B., Sartori G., Kolb E., Gobat J.-M., et al. Humusica 1, article 4: Terrestrial humus systems and forms – Specific terms and diagnostic horizons // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018. V. 122. P. 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.07.005
  85. Zanella A., Ponge J.-F., Jabiol B., Sartori G., Kolb E., Le Bayon R.-C., et al. Humusica 1, article 5: Terrestrial humus systems and forms – Keys of classification of humus systems and forms // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018. V. 122. P. 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.06.012
  86. Zanella A., Ponge J.-F., Jabiol B., Van Delft B., De Waal R., Katzensteiner K., et al. A standardized morpho-functional classification of the Planet’s humipedons // Soil Systems. 2022. V. 6. № 3. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems6030059
  87. Zanella A., Ponge J.-F., Matteodo M. Humusica 1, article 7: Terrestrial humus systems and forms – Field practice and sampling problems // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018. V. 122. P. 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.05.028

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Mesomull

Download (61KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Oligomull

Download (67KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Dysmull

Download (80KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Hemimoder

Download (79KB)
Indexing metadata
6. Eumoder

Download (155KB)
Indexing metadata
7. Dysmoder

Download (73KB)
Indexing metadata
8. Hemimor

Download (71KB)
Indexing metadata
9. Humimor

Download (72KB)
Indexing metadata
10. Eumor

Download (125KB)
Indexing metadata
11. Fig. 1. Location of sample plots in the research area (on the left – the entire territory, on the right – the South-West forest park).

Download (1MB)
Indexing metadata
12. Fig. 2. Chemical parameters of organic (O) and organomineral (AY) horizons of soils of urban (U+) and suburban (U–) forests with absent (R1), weak (R2) and strong (R3) recreational load

Download (636KB)
Indexing metadata
13. Fig. 3. Metal content (μg/g) in organic (O) and organomineral (AY) horizons of soils of urban (U+) and suburban (U–) forests with absent (R1), weak (R2) and strong (R3) recreational load.

Download (654KB)
Indexing metadata
14. Fig. 4. The thickness of the O horizon (a), the AY horizon (b) and the ratio of the AY/O thicknesses (c) in urban (U+) and suburban (U–) forests with absent (R1), weak (R2) and strong (R3) recreational load

Download (250KB)
Indexing metadata
15. Fig. 5. Spectra of humus forms of urban (U+) and suburban (U–) forests with absent (R1), weak (R2) and strong (R3) recreational load.

Download (178KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences