Cambrian Microfossils of the Genus Corollasphaeridium: New Interpretation and Revision of Systematics

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Bell-shaped microfossils found in Lower Cambrian Tommotian of the Siberian Platform were compared with morphologically similar forms of the Lower Cambrian of Australia, assigned to the acritarch genus Corollasphaeridium (Martin in Dean et Martin, 1982) Martin, 1992 (Gravestock et al., 2001). Revision of the genus using geometric-morphometric method allowed us to justify the separation of Siberian and Australian forms into a separate genus Spicaticampaniformis gen. nov. with two species in its composition. A description of the new genus is given and supplemented descriptions of species of S. aliquolumus and S. opimolumus. According to the revealed characteristics of their structure, excluding the form of a whole closed body, inherent to acritarchs, and also taking into account the variability of features comparable with model organisms (priapulids, acanthocephalans, chitinozoa), the assignment of the genera Corollasphaeridium and Spicaticaticampaniformis to the Metazoa group is proposed. General regularities in the variation of species of Spicaticampaniformis opimolumus and Acanthocephala, which may indicate similar ecomorphotypes, as well as Corollasphaeridium wilcoxianum and Priapulida, which may also be ecomorphotypes, are described.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

O. Dantes

Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics IPGG SB RAS; Borisyak Institute of Paleontology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: 1429olga@gmail.com
Ресей, Novosibirsk, 630090; Moscow, 117647

K. Nagovitsin

Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics IPGG SB RAS

Email: 1429olga@gmail.com
Ресей, Novosibirsk, 630090

E. Raevskaya

All-Russian Scientific Research Geological Institute named after A.P. Karpinsky

Email: 1429olga@gmail.com
Ресей, St. Petersburg, 199106

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Герман Т.Н. Из опыта извлечения крупных растительных остатков и микрофоссилий с помощью химического растворения пород // Тр. ИГиГ СО АН СССР. 1974. T. 81. C. 97–99.
  2. Дантес О.В., Наговицин К.Е., Раевская Е.Г. Первые находки кембрийских проблематик Corollasphaeridium на Сибирской платформе: Результаты сравнительно-анатомического анализа // Био- и геособытия в истории Земли. Этапность эволюции и стратиграфическая корреляция. Матер. LXIX сессии Палеонтол. об-ва при РАН. СПб.: Картфабрика ВСЕГЕИ, 2023. C. 35–37.
  3. Коровников И.В. Новые данные по биостратиграфии нижнего и среднего кембрия северо-востока Сибирской платформы (разрез р. Хорбосуоюса, Оленекское поднятие) // Геол. и геофизика. 2002. T. 43. № 9. C. 826–836.
  4. Никишин В.П. Цитоморфология скребней (покровы, защитные оболочки, эмбриональные личинки). М.: ГЕОС, 2004. 234 с.
  5. Раевская Е.Г., Баньели Г., Дантес О.В. Кембрийский род акритарх Corollasphaeridium ‒ новые данные к пересмотру систематического положения // Био- и геособытия в истории Земли. Этапность эволюции и стратиграфическая корреляция. Матер. LXIX сессии Палеонтол. об-ва при РАН. СПб.: Картфабрика ВСЕГЕИ, 2023. C. 121–124.
  6. Achab A., Maletz J. The age of the Euconochitina symmetrica Zone and implication for Lower Ordovician chitinozoan and graptolite zonations of Laurentia // Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2021. V. 295. P. 104508.
  7. Adrianov A.V., Malakhov V.V. Symmetry of priapulids (Priapulida). 2. Symmetry of larvae // J. Morphol. 2001. V. 247. № 2. P. 111‒121.
  8. Amberg C.E., Molyneux S.G., Zalasiewicz J.A., Vandenbroucke T.R. Chitinozoan biostratigraphy of the regional Arenig series in Wales and correlation with the global Lower–Middle Ordovician series and stages // Geol. Mag. 2023. V. 160. № 3. P. 511–534.
  9. Bobrov A., Mazei Y. Morphological variability of Testate Amoebae (Rhizopoda: Testacealobosea: Testaceafilosea) in natural populations // Acta Protozool. 2004. V. 43. P. 133‒146.
  10. Calloway C.B. Morphology of the introvert and associated structures of the priapulid Tubiluchus corallicola from Bermuda // Mar. Biol. 1975. V. 31. P. 161‒174.
  11. Cardini A., Elton S. Sample size and sampling error in geometric morphometric studies of size and shape // Zoomorphology. 2007. V. 126. P. 121‒134.
  12. Chen J.-Y. Aspects of Cambrian-Orddovician boundary in Dayangcha, China. Beijing, 1986. 391 p.
  13. Cheng T.C. Acanthocephala: The spiny-headed worms // General Parasitology. Orlando: Acad. Press, 1986. P. 445‒464.
  14. Conway Morris S. The Runes of Evolution: How the Universe Became Self-Aware. Templeton Press, 2015. 488 p.
  15. Couette S., Escarguel G., Montuire S. Constructing, bootstrapping, and comparing morphometric and phylogenetic trees: A case study of New World monkeys (Platyrrhini, Primates) // J. Mammalogy. 2005. V. 86. № 4. P. 773‒781.
  16. Dean W.T., Martin F. The sequence of trilobite faunas and acritarch microfloras at the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary, Wilcox Pass, Alberta, Canada // The Cambrian-Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossil Distributions, and Correlations. Oxford: National Museum Wales, 1982. P. 131‒140.
  17. Dentzien-Dias P.C., Poinar Jr. G., De Figueiredo A.E.Q. et al. Tapeworm eggs in a 270 million-year-old shark coprolite // PLoS ONE. 2013. V. 8. № 1. P. e55007.
  18. Dimitrova Z.M., Georgiev B.B. Ardeirhynchus n. g. (Palaeacanthocephala: Polymorphida: Polymorphidae), with a redescription of A. spiralis (Rudolphi, 1809) n. comb. // Syst. Parasitol. 1994. V. 29. P. 149‒158.
  19. Downie C., Evitt W.R., Sarjeant W.A.S. Dinoflagellates, hystrichospheres, and the classification of the acritarchs // Stanford Univ. Publ. in Geol. Sci. 1963. V. 7. P. 1‒16.
  20. Evitt W.R. A discussion and proposals concerning fossil Dinoflagellates, Hystrichospheres, and Acritarchs // Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1963. V. 49. № 3. P. 298‒302.
  21. Ferreira Cardia D.F., Bertini R.J., Camossi L.G., Letizio L.A. First record of Acanthocephala parasites eggs in coprolites preliminary assigned to Crocodyliformes from the Adamantina Formation (Bauru group, Upper Cretaceous), São Paulo, Brazil // Anais Acad. Brasil. Ciênc. 2019. V. 91. P. e20170848.
  22. García-Prieto L., García-Varea M., Mendoza-Garfias B. Biodiversity of Acanthocephala in Mexico // Rev. Mexicana de Biodivers. 2014. V. 85. P. 177‒182.
  23. Ghavidel-Syooki M., Piri-Kangarshahi M.H. Biostratigraphy of acritarchs, chitinozoans, and miospores from Upper Ordovician sequences in Kuh-e Boghou, southwest of Kashmar, eastern central Iran: Stratigraphic and paleogeographic implications // Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2021. V. 284. P. 104337.
  24. Gomes A.P.N., Cesárioc C.S., Olifiersd N. et al. New morphological and genetic data of Gigantorhynchus echinodiscus (Diesing, 1851) (Acanthocephala: Archiacanthocephala) in the Giant Anteater Myrmecophaga tridactyla Linnaeus, 1758 (Pilosa: Myrmecophagidae) // IJP: Parasites and Wildlife. 2019. V. 10. P. 281‒288.
  25. Gravestock D.I., Alexander E.M., Demidenko Y.E. et al. The Cambrian Biostratigraphy of the Stansbury Basin, South Australia. Moscow: IAPC Nauka/Interperiodica, 2001. 346 p.
  26. Grazhdankin D., Marusin V.V., Izokh O.P. et al. Quo vadis, Tommotian? // Geol. Mag. 2020. V. 157. № 1. P. 22‒34.
  27. Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis // Palaeontol. Electron. 2001. V. 4. № 1. P. 1‒9.
  28. Hernandez-Orts J.S., Lisitsyna O.I., Kuzmina T.A. First morphological and molecular characterization of Cstacanths of Corynosoma evae Zdzitowiecki, 1984 (Acanthocephala: Olymorphidae) from Antarctic teleost fishes // Parasitol. Intern. 2022. V. 91. P. 102616.
  29. Hernández-Orts J.S., Smales L.R., Pinacho-Pinacho C.D. et al. Novel morphological and molecular data for Corynosoma hannae Zdzitowiecki, 1984 (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) from teleosts, fish-eating birds and pinnipeds from New Zealand // Parasitol. Intern. 2017. V. 66. P. 905‒916.
  30. Jones A. Biology of the Acanthocephala // Parasitology today. 1986. V. 2. № 9. P. 259.
  31. Kaimotoa T., Hirazawaa T., Masubuchia T. et al. Host characteristics and infection level of an intestinal parasite Corynosoma strumosum (Acanthocephala) in the Kuril harbor seal of Erimo Cape, Hokkaido, Japan // Parasitol. Intern. 2018. V. 76. № 2. P. 237‒244.
  32. Kaufman A.J., Peek S., Martin A.J. et al. A shorter fuse for the Cambrian Explosion? // GSA Annual Meeting in Charlotte. 2012. V. 44. № 7. P. 326.
  33. Klingenberg C.P. Morphoj: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics // Mol. Ecol. Resources. 2011. V. 11. P. 353‒357.
  34. Li L., Chen H.-X., Amin O.M., Yang Y. Morphological variability and molecular characterization of Pomphorhynchus zhoushanensis sp. nov. (Acanthocephala: Pomphorhynchidae), with comments on the systematic status of Pomphorhynchus Monticelli, 1905 // Parasitol. Intern. 2017. V. 66. № 5. P. 693‒698.
  35. Li Y., Chen X., Yao H. et al. Chitinozoan biostratigraphy across the Aeronian–Telychian boundary (Silurian, Llandovery) in the middle Yangtze region of China // Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2021. V. 290. P. 104424.
  36. Liang Y., Tang P., Wang G.-X. et al. Middle–Late Ordovician chitinozoans from Songliang of Qiaojia, western south China, and their biostratigraphic implications // Palaeoworld. 2023. V. 32. № 2. P. 287‒302.
  37. Loy A. Morphometrics and theriology homage to Marco Corti // Hystrix, Ital. J. Mammalogy. 2008. V. 18. № 2. P. 115‒136.
  38. Martin F. Uppermost Cambrian and Lower Ordovician Acritarchs and Lower Ordovician Chitinozoans from Wilcox Pass, Alberta // Bull. Geol. Surv. Canada. 1992. V. 420. 57 p.
  39. Nagovitsin K.E., Rogov V.I., Marusin V.V. et al. Revised Neoproterozoic and Terreneuvian stratigraphy of the Lena-Anabar Basin and north-western slope of the Olenek Uplift, Siberian Platform // Precambr. Res. 2015. V. 270. P. 226‒245.
  40. Nicholas W.L. The biology of the Acanthocephala // Advances in Parasitology. 1967. V. 5. P. 205‒246.
  41. Nicholas W.L. The biology of the Acanthocephala // Advances in Parasitology. 1973. P. 671–706.
  42. Rohlf F.J. The tps series of software // Hystrix, Ital. J. Mammalogy. 2015. V. 26. № 1. P. 9‒12.
  43. Ru S.-S., Rehman A.U., Chen H.-X. et al. Morphology and molecular characterization of Acanthogyrus (Acanthosentis) bilaspurensis Chowhan, Gupta & Khera, 1987 (Acanthocephala: Gyracanthocephala: Quadrigyridae) from the common carp Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in Pakistan // Parasitol. Intern. 2022a. V. 90. P. 102608.
  44. Ru S.-S., Yang R.-J., Chen H.-X. et al. Morphology, molecular characterization and phylogeny of Bolbosoma nipponicum Yamaguti, 1939 (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae), a potential zoonotic parasite of human acanthocephaliasis // Intern. J. Parasitol.: Parasites and Wildlife. 2022b. V. 18. P. 212‒220.
  45. Slater B.J., Bohlin M.S. Animal origins: The record from organic microfossils // Earth-Sci. Rev. 2022. V. 232. P. 104107.
  46. Slater B.J., Harvey T.H.P., Butterfield N.J. Small carbonaceous fossils (SCFs) from the Terreneuvian (Lower Cambrian) of Baltica // Palaeontology. 2018. V. 61. Pt. 3. P. 417‒439.
  47. Smith S.M., Wilson G.P. Species discrimination of co-occurring small fossil mammals: A case study of the Cretaceous-Paleogene multituberculate genus Mesodma // J. Mammal Evol. 2017. V. 24. P. 147‒157.
  48. Sørensen M.V., Rho H.S., Min W.-G., Kim D. A new recording of the rare Priapulid Meiopriapulus fijiensis, with comparative notes on juvenile and adult morphology // Zool. Anzeiger. 2012. V. 251. № 4. P. 364‒371.
  49. Taraschewski H. Host-parasite interactions in Acanthocephala: A morphological approach // Advances in Parasitol. 2000. V. 41. P. 1‒179.
  50. Van Cleave H.J. Some host-parasite relationships of the Acanthocephala, with special reference to the organs of attachment // Experimental Parasitol. 1952. V. 1. № 3. P. 305‒330.
  51. Violle C., Navas M.-L., Vile D. et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! // Oikos. 2007. V. 116. P. 882‒892.
  52. Wang X.-F., Stouge S., Maletz J. et al. Correlating the global Cambrian–Ordovician boundary: Precise comparison of the Xiaoyangqiao section, Dayangcha, north China with the Green Point GSSP section, Newfoundland, Canada // Palaeoworld. 2019. V. 28. № 3. P. 243‒275.
  53. Weber G.W., Bookstein F. Virtual Anthropology. A Guide to a New Interdisciplinary Field. Springer Vienna, 2011. 423 с.
  54. Wennberg S.A., Janssen R., Budd G.E. Hatching and earliest larval stages of the Priapulid worm Priapulus caudatus // Invertebr. Biol. 2009. V. 128. № 2. P. 157–171.
  55. Wernström J.V., Slater B.J., Sørensen M.V. et al. Geometric morphometrics of macro- and meiofaunal priapulid pharyngeal teeth provides a proxy for studying Cambrian “tooth taxa” // Zoomorphology. 2023. V. 142. P. 411–421.
  56. Yin L.-M. Comparison and stratigraphic significance of the palynoflora // Aspects of Cambrian-Ordovician boundary in Dayangcha China / Ed. Chen J.-Y. Beijing, 1986. P. 101‒112.
  57. Zang W.-L., Moczydłowska M., Jago J.B. Early Cambrian acritarch assemblage zones in South Australia and global correlation // Mem. Assoc. Australas. Palaeontol. 2007. V. 33. P. 141‒177.
  58. Zhao Q., Muhammad N., Chen H.-X. et al. Morphological and genetic characterisation of Centrorhynchus clitorideus (Meyer, 1931) (Acanthocephala: Centrorhynchidae) from the Little Owl Athene noctua (Scopoli) (Strigiformes: Strigidae) in Pakistan // Syst. Parasitol. 2020. T. 97. P. 517‒528.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Geographical position, do not chop the mic of the strategic Corollasphaeridium strategic column distribution: Peter I. – geographical positions of the non-strategic column: a – the area under study (squared), b – the Olenek uplift location, c – the waters of the strategic column (boiler: Grazhdankin et al., 2020, p. Change); II – the world distribution of the Corollasphaeridium boiler microphot test: 1-3 – Siberian materials, attributed to K. V. given gen Spicaticampaniformis working nov.; 4-8 – Australian material: 4, 5 – S. aliquolumus, 6-8 – S. opimolumus; 9, 10 – Canadian wilcoxianum materials corollasphaeridium is not a Chinese palace (10 –C. boiler normalisum: Gravestock et al., 2001).

Жүктеу (88KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Designation of measured values on microfossils: L is the length, Lpr is the length of the outgrowth, Wmax is the maximum width, Wmin is the minimum width, D is the diameter of the basal hole, B is the height of the basal part.

Жүктеу (53KB)
Метадеректер
4. Table 2

Жүктеу (108KB)
Метадеректер
5. Table 3

Жүктеу (72KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024