Obtaining carbon nanotubes dispersions in solutions of ethoxylated fatty alcohols for modifying gel systems

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

A systematic study of the effect of nonionic surfactants – ethoxylated higher fatty alcohols with a variable degree of ethoxylation on the process of ultrasonic dispersion of carbon nanotubes in aqueous solutions and on the colloidal-chemical properties of the resulting dispersions during long-term storage – optical density, size and electrokinetic potential of the particles of colloidal systems was carried out. A non-linear dependence of the characteristics of dispersions on the ethoxylation degree associated with structural changes in the molecules of nonionic surfactants was revealed. The most effective ethoxylation degree and the concentration of nonionic surfactants in solution, which have the highest disaggregating and stabilizing effects in the preparation of carbon nanotube (CNT) dispersions, have been determined. The effect ethoxylation degree of ethoxylated higher fatty alcohols on the electrokinetic properties of CNT dispersions has been revealed. The possibility of using carbon nanotube dispersions for modifying the rheological and electrical properties of gel systems based on lightly crosslinked polyacrylic acid is shown. The effect of nonionic surfactants and CNTs on viscosity, shear yield point, consistency index, mechanical stability, relaxation time, and viscous flow activation energy of polymer gels has been studied. It is shown that the introduction of nanotubes leads to an increase in the electrical conductivity of the gels. The ultrastructure of gel samples was studied by transmission electron microscopy.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

A. Gataullin

Казанский национальный исследовательский технологический университет

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: zulfat.azari@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, ул. Карла Маркса, 68, Казань, 420015

V. Abramov

Казанский национальный исследовательский технологический университет

Email: zulfat.azari@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, ул. Карла Маркса, 68, Казань, 420015

S. Bogdanova

Казанский национальный исследовательский технологический университет

Email: zulfat.azari@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, ул. Карла Маркса, 68, Казань, 420015

V. Salnikov

Казанский институт биохимии и биофизики ФИЦ КазНЦ РАН

Email: zulfat.azari@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, ул. Лобачевского, 2/31, Казань, 420111

Yu. Zuev

Казанский институт биохимии и биофизики ФИЦ КазНЦ РАН

Email: zulfat.azari@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, ул. Лобачевского, 2/31, Казань, 420111

Yu. Galyametdinov

Казанский национальный исследовательский технологический университет

Email: zulfat.azari@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, ул. Карла Маркса, 68, Казань, 420015

参考

  1. Kuo T.-R., Hovhannisyan V.A., Chao Y.-C., Chao S.-L., Chiang S.-J., Lin S.-J., Dong C.-Y., Chen C.-C. Multiple release kinetics of targeted drug from gold nanorod embedded polyelectrolyte conjugates induced by near-infrared laser irradiation // Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010. V. 132. № 40. P. 14163–14171. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja105360z
  2. Hosoyama K., Ahumada M., McTiernan C.D., Davis D.R., Variola F., Ruel M., Liang W., Suuronen E.J., Alarcon E.I. Nanoengineered electroconductive collagen-based cardiac patch for infarcted myocardium repair // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018. V. 10. № 51. P. 44668–44677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b18844
  3. Cai J., Zhang X., Liu W., Huang J., Qiu X. Synthesis of highly conductive hydrogel with high strength and super toughness // Polymer. 2020. V. 202. P. 122643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122643
  4. Zare E.N., Abdollahi T., Motahari A. Effect of functionalization of iron oxide nanoparticles on the physical properties of poly (aniline-co-pyrrole) based nanocomposites: Experimental and theoretical studies // Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2020. V. 13. № 1. P. 2331–2339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.04.016
  5. Ичкитидзе Л.П., Подгаецкий В.М. Электропроводный биосовместимый композиционный наноматериал с углеродными нанотрубками // Медицинская техника. 2011. № 6. С. 25–28.
  6. Dusenberg B., Tischer F., Seidel A. M., Kopp S. P., Schmidt J., Roth S., Buck A. Production and analysis of electrically conductive polymer–carbon-black composites for powder based additive manufacturing // Procedia CIRP. 2022. V. 111. P. 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.08.107
  7. Boruah M., Phukon P., Saikia B.J., Dolui S.K. Electrical actuation of electroresponsive hydrogels based on poly (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) / graphite suitable for biomedical applications // Polymer composites. 2014. V. 35. № 1. P. 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.22630
  8. Khan S.A., Lazoglu I. Development of additively manufacturable and electrically conductive graphite–polymer composites // Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2020. V. 5. № 2. P. 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00102-95
  9. Gubaidullin A.T., Makarova A.O., Derkach S.R., Voron’ko N.G., Kadyirov A.I., Ziganshina S.A., Salnikov V.V., Zueva O.S., Zuev Yu.F. Modulation of molecular structure and mechanical properties of k-carrageenan-gelatin hydrogel with multi-walled carbon nanotubes // Polymers. 2022. V. 14. № 12. P. 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122346.
  10. Кондрашов С.В., Грачев В.П., Акатенков Р.В., Алексашин В.М., Деев И.С., Аношкин И.В., Раков Э.Г., Иржак В.И. Модифицирование эпоксидных полимеров малыми добавками многослойных углеродных нанотрубок // Высокомолекулярные соединения. Серия А. 2014. Т. 56. № 3. С. 316–322. https://doi.org/10.7868/S2308112014030079
  11. Li R., Bao Z., Wang P., Deng Y., Fan J., Zhu X., Xia X., Song Y., Yao H., Li D. Gelatin-functionalized carbon nanotubes loaded with cisplatin for anti-cancer therapy // Polymers. 2023. V. 15. № 16. P. 3333. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163333
  12. Kuche K., Maheshwari R., Tambe V., Mak K.-K., Jogi H., Raval N., Pichika M.R., Tekade R.K. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) based advanced dermal therapeutics: current trends and future potential // Nanoscale. 2018. V. 10. № 19. P. 8911–8937. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR01383G
  13. Wong B.S., Yoong S.L., Jagusiak A., Panczyk T., Ho H.K., Ang W.H., Pastorin G. Carbon nanotubes for delivery of small molecule drugs // Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2013. V. 65. № 15. P. 1964–2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.08.005
  14. Yun J., Im J.S., Lee Y.-S., Kim H.-I. Electro-responsive transdermal drug delivery behavior of PVA/PAA/MWCNT nanofibers // European Polymer Journal. 2011. V. 47. № 10. P. 1893–1902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.07.024
  15. Madeo L.F., Curcio M., Iemma F., Nicoletta F.P., Hampel S.; Cirillo G. Release of bioactive molecules from graphene oxide-alginate hybrid hydrogels: Effect of crosslinking method // C. 2023. V. 9. № 1. P. 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/c9010008
  16. Zeng L., Gowda B.H.J, Ahmed M.G., Abourehab M.A.S., Chen Z.S, Zhang C., Li J., Kesharwani P. Advancements in nanoparticle-based treatment approaches for skin cancer therapy // Molecular Cancer. 2023. V. 22. P. 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-022-01708-4
  17. Dalla Colletta A., Pelin M., Sosa S., Fusco L., Prato M., Tubaro A. Carbon-based nanomaterials and skin: An overview // Carbon. 2022. V. 196. P. 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.05.036
  18. Palmer B.C., Phelan-Dickenson S.J., DeLouise L.A. Multi-walled carbon nanotube oxidation dependent keratinocyte cytotoxicity and skin inflammation // Particle and fibre toxicology. 2019. V. 16. № 1. P. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-018-0285-x
  19. Park Y.H., Jeong S.H., Lee E.Y., Lee S.H., Choi B.H., Kim M.K., Son S.W. Assessment of dermal irritation potential of MWCNT // Toxicology and environmental health sciences. 2010. V. 2. P. 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216492
  20. Kim S.H., Lee D.H., Lee J.H., Yang J.Y., Shin H.S., Lee J., Jung K., Jeong J., Oh J.H., Lee J.K. Evaluation of the skin sensitization potential of carbon nanotubes using alternative in vitro and in vivo assays // Toxics. 2020. V. 8. № 4. P. 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics8040122
  21. Vankoningsloo S., Piret J.P., Saout C., Noel F., Mejia J., Zouboulis C.C., Delhalle J., Lucas S., Toussaint O. Cytotoxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in three skin cellular models: Effects of sonication, dispersive agents and corneous layer of reconstructed epidermis // Nanotoxicology. 2010. V. 4. № 1. P. 84–97. https//doi.org/10.3109/17435390903428869
  22. MacDonald R.A., Voge C.M., Kariolis M., Stegemann J.P. Carbon nanotubes increase the electrical conductivity of fibroblast-seeded collagen hydrogels // Acta Biomaterialia. 2008. V. 4. № 6. P. 1583–1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.005
  23. Voge C.M., Johns J., Raghavan M., Morris M.D., Stegemann J.P. Wrapping and dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes improves electrical conductivity of protein–nanotube composite biomaterials // J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2013. V. 101. № 1. P. 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34310
  24. Pikula K., Chaika V., Zakharenko A., Markina Z., Vedyagin A., Kuznetsov V., Gusev A., Park S., Golokhvast K. Comparison of the level and mechanisms of toxicity of carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, and silicon nanotubes in bioassay with four marine microalgae // Nanomaterials. 2020. V. 10. № 3. P. 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030485
  25. Бадамшина Э.Р., Гафурова М.П., Эстрин Я.И. Модифицирование углеродных нанотрубок и синтез полимерных композитов с их участием // Успехи химии. 2010. Т. 79. № 11. С. 1027–1064.
  26. Гигиберия В.А., Арьев И.А., Лебовка Н.И. Устойчивость суспензий многослойных углеродных нанотрубок в органических растворителях в присутствии Triton X-165 // Коллоидный журнал. 2012. Т. 74. № 6. С. 696–701.
  27. Li F., Liu L., Yang Z., Li S. Dispersion of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes in aqueous solution // Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2021. V. 95. P. 1009–1016. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024421050125
  28. Li H., Qiu Y. Dispersion, sedimentation and aggregation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes as affected by single and binary mixed surfactants // Royal Society Open Science. 2019. V. 6. № 7. P. 190241. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190241
  29. Abreu B., Rocha J., Fernandes R.M., Regev O., Furo I., Marques E.F. Gemini surfactants as efficient dispersants of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: Interplay of molecular parameters on nanotube dispersibility and debundling // Journal of colloid and interface science. 2019. V. 547. P. 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.082
  30. Гатауллин А.Р., Богданова С.А., Рахматуллина А.П., Галяметдинов Ю.Г. Диспергирование углеродных нанотрубок в растворах оксиэтилированных изононилфенолов // Журнал прикладной химии. 2017. Т. 90. № 11. С. 1489–1497.
  31. Гатауллин А.Р., Богданова С.А., Галяметдинов Ю.Г. Диспергирование фуллерена С60 в организованных средах // Жидкие кристаллы и их практическое использование. 2019. Т. 19. № 1. С. 6–13.
  32. Задымова Н.М. Коллоидно-химические аспекты трансдермальной доставки лекарств (обзор) // Коллоидный журнал. 2013. Т. 75. № 5. С. 543–556. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0023291213050194
  33. Sheeba F.R., Giles D., Shivakumar Swamy S.K., Menaka T. Study on permeation enhancement of Sparfloxacin from certain selected ointment bases // Der. Pharmacia Letter. 2012. V. 4. P. 1115–1118.
  34. Akhtar N., Rehman M.U., Khan H.M.S., Rasool F., Saeed T., Murtaza G. Penetration enhancing effect of polysorbate 20 and 80 on the in vitro percutaneous absorption of L-ascorbic acid // Tropical J. Pharm. Res. 2011. V. 10. № 3. P. 281. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v10i3.1
  35. Strati F., Neubert R., Opalka L., Kerth A., Brezesinski G. Non-ionic surfactants as innovative skin penetration enhancers: Insight in the mechanism of interaction with simple 2D stratum corneum model system // European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021. V. 157. P. 105620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105620
  36. Deng Z., Yu R., Guo B. Stimuli-responsive conductive hydrogels: Design, properties, and applications // Materials Chemistry Frontiers. 2021. V. 5. № 5. P. 2092–2123. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0qm00868k
  37. Servant A., Methven L., Williams R.P., Kostarelos K. Electroresponsive polymer-carbon nanotube hydrogel hybrids for pulsatile drug delivery in vivo // Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2013. V. 2. № 6. P. 806–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200193
  38. Adorinni S., Rozhin P., Marchesan S. Smart hydrogels meet carbon nanomaterials for new frontiers in medicine // Biomedicines. 2021. V. 9. № 5. P. 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050570
  39. Ткачев А.Г., Мищенко С.В., Негров В.Л., Меметов Н.Р., Пасько А.А., Блинов С.В., Турлаков Д.А. Промышленное производство углеродного наноструктурного материала “Таунит” // Наноиндустрия. 2007. № 2. С. 24–27.
  40. Shvartzman-Cohen R., Levi-Kalisman Y., Nativ-Roth E., Yerushalmi-Rozen R. Generic approach for dispersing single-walled carbon nanotubes: The strength of a weak interaction // Langmuir. 2004. V. 20. № 15. P. 6085–6088. https://doi.org/10.1021/la049344j
  41. Bandyopadhyaya R., Nativ-Roth E., Regev O., Yerushalmi-Rozen R. Stabilization of individual carbon nanotubes in aqueous solutions // Nano Letters. 2002. V. 2. № 1. P. 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl010065f
  42. de Almeida Carisio P., dos Santos Mendonca Y.G., Soares C.F.T., Reales O.A.M., de Moraes Rego Fairbairn E., Filho R.D.T. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes with different types of superplasticizer as a dispersing agent for self-sensing cementitious materials // Appl. Sci. 2021. V. 11. № 18. P. 8452. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188452
  43. Predtechenskiy M.R., Khasin A.A., Bezrodny A.E., Bobrenok O.F., Dubov D.Y., Muradyan V.E., Saik V.O., Smirnov S.N. New perspectives in SWCNT applications: Tuball SWCNTs. Part 1 Tuball by itself – all you need to know about it // Carbon Trends. 2022. V. 8. P. 100175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cartre.2022.100175
  44. Youssry M., Al-Ruwaidhi M., Zakeri M. Physical functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes for enhanced dispersibility in aqueous medium // Emergent Materials. 2020. V. 3. P. 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-020-00076-3
  45. Gataullin A.R., Bogdanova S.A., Galyametdinov Yu.G. Adsorption of ethoxylated isononylphenols on carbon nanotubes from aqueous solutions // ChemChemTech. 2021. V. 64. № 3. P. 46–51. https://doi.org/10.6060/ivkkt.20216403.6192
  46. Zaman A.C., Kaya F., Kaya C. A study on optimum surfactant to multiwalled carbon nanotube ratio in alcoholic stable suspensions via UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy and zeta potential analysis // Ceramics international. 2020. V. 46. № 18. P. 29120–29129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.085
  47. Ткачев А.Г., Мележик А.В., Дьячкова Т.П., Блохин А.Н., Буракова Е.А., Пасько Т.В. Углеродные наноматериалы серии “Таунит”: производство и применение // Известия высших учебных заведений. Серия: Химия и химическая технология. 2013. Т. 56. № 4. С. 55–59.
  48. Захарычев Е.А., Кабина М.А., Разов Е.Н., Семенычева Л.Л. Исследование устойчивости водных суспензий функционализированных углеродных нанотрубок // Коллоидный журнал. 2016. Т. 78. № 5. С. 556–561. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0023291216050244
  49. Барань Ш., Картель Н., Месарош Р. Электрокинетический потенциал многослойных углеродных нанотрубок в водных растворах электролитов и ПАВ // Коллоидный журнал. 2014. Т. 76. № 5. С. 555–559. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0023291214050024
  50. Петренко Д.Б. Модифицированный метод Боэма для определения гидроксильных групп в углеродных нанотрубках // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. 2012. № 1. С. 157–160.
  51. White B., Banerjee S., O’Brien S., Turro N.J., Herman I.P. Zeta-potential measurements of surfactant-wrapped individual single-walled carbon nanotubes // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007. V. 111. № 37. P. 13684–13690. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp070853e
  52. Selivanova N.M., Galeeva A.I., Galyametdinov Yu.G. Chitosan/lactic acid systems: Liquid crystalline behavior, rheological properties, and riboflavin release in vitro // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022. V. 23. № 21. P. 13207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113207
  53. Haider X.S., Park S.-Y., Saeed K., Farmer B.L. Swelling and electroresponsive characteristics of gelatin immobilized onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes // Sensors and Actuators B. 2007. V. 124. № 2. P. 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2007.01.024
  54. Малкин А.Я., Исаев А.И. Реология: концепции, методы, приложения. СПб.: Профессия, 2007. 560 с.
  55. Лебовка Н.И., Лисунова М.А., Бойко Ю.П., Мележик А.В. Исследование перколяционного поведения электрической проводимости и вязкости в водных суспензиях многослойных углеродных нанотрубок // Коллоидные системы и новейшие технологии. 2007. Т. 5. № 1. С. 165–175.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Dependence of the optical density of CNT dispersions (0.1% wt.) on the concentration of the OE VZhS in aqueous solutions after 24 hours (a) and after 30 days (b) after ultrasonic treatment: 1 – n = 7, 2 – n = 8, 3 – n = 3, 4 – n = 10.

下载 (25KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Dependence of the average hydrodynamic diameter of CNT dispersion particles (0.1% by weight) on the degree of oxyethylation and the concentration of the OE of the VZhS in aqueous solutions after 1 day (a) and after 30 days (b) after ultrasonic treatment.

下载 (33KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Particle size distribution in dispersions obtained by ultrasonic treatment of CNTs in water (1, 1') and in aqueous solutions of OE VZhS n = 10 (2, 2' – 6.3∙10–4 mol/l; 3, 3' – 20.0∙10–4 mol/l) after 1 day (1, 2, 3) and after 30 days (1', 2', 3').

下载 (16KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. Dependence of the average electrokinetic potential of CNT dispersion particles (0.1% by weight) on the degree of oxyethylation and the concentration of the OE of the VZhS in aqueous solutions after 1 day (a) and after 30 days (b) after ultrasonic treatment.

下载 (39KB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 5. Flow (a) and viscosity (b) curves of gel systems: 1 – base gel; 2 – gel with OE VFS n = 10 (6.3∙10–4 mol/l); 3 – gel with CNTs (247 mg/l); 4 – gel with CNTs (378 mg/l) and OE VFS n = 10 (6.3∙10–4 mol/l).

下载 (23KB)
索引源数据
7. Fig. 6. Micrographs of gel systems obtained using CNT dispersions in water (a, scale 2 µm) and an aqueous solution of OE VZhS n = 10 (b, scale 500 nm).

下载 (27KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024