<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Terapevticheskii arkhiv</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Terapevticheskii arkhiv</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Терапевтический архив</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0040-3660</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2309-5342</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">LLC Obyedinennaya Redaktsiya</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">31553</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Editorial article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Передовая статья</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">AIM. To evaluate the efficiency and safety of Livodexa monotherapy in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) after gastric resection or gastrectomy.</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Курсовое и поддерживающее лечение больных c рефлюкс-эзофагитом после гастрэктомии или резекции желудка</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Minushkin</surname><given-names>O N</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Минушкин</surname><given-names>О Н</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Maslovskiĭ</surname><given-names>L V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Масловский</surname><given-names>Л В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>lemas3@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shuleshova</surname><given-names>A G</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шулешова</surname><given-names>А Г</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nazarov</surname><given-names>N S</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Назаров</surname><given-names>Н С</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en"></institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ "Учебно-научный медицинский центр" УД Президента РФ, Москва</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014-08-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>08</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>86</volume><issue>8</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 86, NO8 ()</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 86, №8 (2014)</issue-title><fpage>50</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-04-10"><day>10</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2014, Consilium Medicum</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2014, ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/view/31553">https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/view/31553</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>MATERIALS AND METHODS. The investigators examined 30 patients (16 men, 14 women) after gastrectomy (n = 15) or gastric resection (n = 15) who had anacidity as shown by pH-metry and the clinical and/or endoscopic signs of RE. During 4 months, Groups 1 and 2 patients received the drug in doses of 10 and 15 mg/kg/day, respectively. Maintenance treatment was performed for 2 months. The maintenance therapy group included 25 patients, including 12 patients who took Livodexa in a dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day (Group 1) and 13 patients who had 5 mg/kg/day (Group 2) during 2 months. RESULTS. Treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (Livodexa) resulted in the significantly reduced frequency and intensity of the major symptoms of the disease (heartburn, retrosternal pain, bitter eructation), by achieving a maximum effect at 4 months of therapy. Endoscopic remission was observed in 63.3 and 83.3% of the patients at 4 and 6 months of treatment, respectively. There was a significant and steady rise in the quality of life as evidenced by a visual analogue scale. The ursodeoxycholic acid dose of 10 mg/kg was effective in patients with grade 1 RE (single erosions) while it should be increased up to 15 mg/kg in those with more significant esophageal mucosal injury (grades 2-3 RE). Some patients receiving a maintenance dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day were recorded to have recurrent reflux disease with a relapse of clinical manifestations and a morphological substrate as catarrhal esophagitis. The group of patients receiving maintenance therapy (5 mg/kg/day) retained the achieved clinical and morphological remission. CONCLUSION. The findings suggest that Livodexa is effective in patients of this category.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Резюме. Цель исследования. Оценка эффективности и безопасности монотерапии препаратом Ливодекса у больных рефлюкс-эзофагитом (РЭ) после резекции желудка или гастрэктомии. Материалы и методы. Обследовали 30 пациентов (16 мужчин, 14 женщин), перенесших гастрэктомию (15 больных) и резекцию желудка (15 больных) с анацидностью по данным рН-метрии, имеющих клинические и/или эндоскопические признаки РЭ. Больные 1-й группы получали препарат в дозе 10 мг/кг/сут, во 2-й группе - 15 мг/кг/сут в течение 4 мес. Поддерживающее лечение проводили на протяжении 2 мес. В группу поддерживающей терапии включили 25 больных, из них 12 (1-я группа) получали Ливодексу в дозе 2,5 мг/кг/сут, 13 (2-я группа) - 5 мг/кг/сут в течение 2 мес. Результаты. Лечение препаратом урсодезоксихолевой кислоты Ливодекса привело к достоверному снижению частоты и интенсивности основных симптомов заболевания (изжоги, загрудинных болей, отрыжки горьким) с достижением максимального эффекта к 4-му месяцу терапии. Эндоскопическая ремиссия к 4-му месяцу лечения наблюдалась у 63,3% пациентов и к 6-му месяцу - у 83,3%. Отмечался достоверный и постоянный рост качества жизни по данным визуальной аналоговой шкалы (ВАШ). У больных с РЭ I степени (единичные эрозии) доза урсодезоксихолевой кислоты 10 мг/кг являлась эффективной, в то время как при более выраженном повреждении слизистой оболочки пищевода (РЭ II-III степени) требовалось увеличение дозы до 15 мг/кг. У отдельных больных, получающих поддерживающую дозу 2,5 мг/кг/сут, фиксировался рецидив "рефлюксной" болезни с возвратом клинических проявлений и морфологического субстрата в виде катарального эзофагита. Группа пациентов, которая получала поддерживающую терапию 5 мг/кг/сут, сохранила достигнутую клинико-морфологическую ремиссию. Заключение. Полученные результаты свидетельствует об эффективности препарата Ливодекса у больных этой категории.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>reflux esophagitis</kwd><kwd>ursodeoxycholic acid</kwd><kwd>alkaline reflux</kwd><kwd>gastroesophageal reflux disease</kwd><kwd>maintenance therap</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рефлюкс эзофагит</kwd><kwd>урсодезоксихолевая кислота</kwd><kwd>щелочной рефлюкс</kwd><kwd>ГЭРБ</kwd><kwd>поддерживающая терапия</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Fuchs K.H., Maroske J., Fein M. et al. Heimbucher J. Thiede A.Variability in the composition of physiologic duodenogastric reflux. J Gastrointest Surg 1999; 3 (4): 389-395; discussion 395-396.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Kauer W.K., Stein H.J. Role of acid and bile in the genesis of Barrett's esophagus. Chest Surg Clin N Am 2002; 12 (1): 39-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Marshall R.E., Anggiansah A., Manifold D.K. et al. Effect of omeprazole 20 mg twice daily on duodenogastric and gastro-oesophageal bile reflux in Barrett's oesophagus. Gut 1998; 43 (5): 603-606.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Stein H.J., Kauer W.K., Feussner H., Siewert J.R. Bile reflux in benign and malignant Barrett's esophagus: effect of medical acid suppression and nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 1998; 2 (4): 333-341.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Vaezi M.F., Richter J.E. Importance of duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux in the medical outpatient practice. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46 (25): 40-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Vaezi M.F., Richter J.E. Duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 14 (5): 719-729.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Vaezi MF., LaCamera R.G., Richter J.E. Bilitec 2000 ambulatory duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux. Monitoring. Am J Physiol 1994; 267: 1050-1057.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Pelegrini C.A., Wernly J.A. Alkline gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Surg 1978; 75: 177-184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Attwood S.E.A., DeMeesteer T.R., Bremner C.G. et al. Alkline gastroesophageal reflux: implication in the development of complications in Barrett's oesophagus. Surgery 1989; 106: 764-776.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>De Vault K.R., Georgeson S., Castell D.O. Salivary stimulation mimics esophageal exposure to reflux duodenal contents. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 1040-1043.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Singh S., Bradly L.A., Richter J.E. Determinacy of esophageal alkline pH enviroment and controls in-patients with GERD. Gut 1993; 34: 309-316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Bechi P., Paucciani F., Baldini F. et al. Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of new fiberoptic technique. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 1297-1306.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Vaezi M.F., Richter J.E. Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol 1996; 111: 1192-1199.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Nehra D., Howell P., Pye J.K., Beynon J. Assessment of combined bile acid and pH profiles using an automated sampling device in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 1998; 85 (1): 134-137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Stein H.J., Kauer W.K., Feussner H., Siewert J.R. Bile acids as components of the duodenogastric refluxate: detection, relationship to bilirubin, mechanism of injury, and clinical relevance. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46 (25): 66-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Bechi P., Cianchi F., Mazzanti R. et al. Reflux and pH: "alkaline" components are not neutralized by gastric pH variations. Dis Esophagus 2000; 13 (1): 51-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Nehra D., Howell P., Williams C.P. et al. Toxic bile acids in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: influence of gastric acidity. Gut 1999; 44 (5): 598-602.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Vela M.F., Camacho-Lobato L., Srinivasan R. et al. Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 2001; 120 (7): 1599-1606.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Parrila P., Martinez de Haro L.F., Ortiz A. еt al. In patients with esophagitis, does surgery increase the prevalence of Barrett, s esophagus? In "Barrett's esophagus 250 questions, 250 answers". Ed by R.Giuli et al. 2003: 247-248.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
