<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Terapevticheskii arkhiv</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Terapevticheskii arkhiv</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Терапевтический архив</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0040-3660</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2309-5342</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">LLC Obyedinennaya Redaktsiya</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">104840</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26442/00403660.2022.01.201343</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обзоры</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">PROM a contemporary approach to assessing the quality of life of patients with cancer</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>PROM – современный подход к оценке качества жизни пациентов с онкологическими заболеваниями</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4088-8118</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khatkov</surname><given-names>Igor E.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хатьков</surname><given-names>Игорь Евгеньевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, проф., дир. ГБУЗ «МКНПЦ им. А.С. Логинова», зав. каф. факультетской хирургии №2 ФГБОУ ВО «МГМСУ им. А.И. Евдокимова»</p></bio><email>niks97@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0294-1424</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Minaeva</surname><given-names>Olga A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Минаева</surname><given-names>Ольга Альбертовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук, нач. отд. экспертизы качества медицинской помощи</p></bio><email>niks97@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-5416</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Domrachev</surname><given-names>Sergey A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Домрачев</surname><given-names>Сергей Анатольевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, вед. науч. сотр. ГБУЗ «МКНПЦ им. А.С. Логинова», проф. каф. факультетской хирургии №2 ФГБОУ ВО «МГМСУ им. А.И. Евдокимова»</p></bio><email>niks97@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4984-9526</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Priymak</surname><given-names>Maxim A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Приймак</surname><given-names>Максим Александрович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>зам. глав. врача по медицинской части</p></bio><email>niks97@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1295-8035</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Solovyev</surname><given-names>Nikita O.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Соловьев</surname><given-names>Никита Олегович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>клинический ординатор</p></bio><email>niks97@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6410-7355</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tyutyunnik</surname><given-names>Pavel S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тютюнник</surname><given-names>Павел Станиславович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач-хирург отд-ния высокотехнологичной хирургии и хирургической эндоскопии ГБУЗ «МКНПЦ им. А.С. Логинова», ассистент каф. факультетской хирургии №2 ФГБОУ ВО «МГМСУ им. А.И. Евдокимова»</p></bio><email>niks97@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГБУЗ «Московский клинический научно-практический центр им. А.С. Логинова» Департамента здравоохранения г. Москвы</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет им. А.И. Евдокимова» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022-01-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>128</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-03-14"><day>14</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-03-14"><day>14</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2022, Consilium Medicum</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2022, ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/view/104840">https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/view/104840</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>PRO (patient reported outcomes) is a patient's subjective assessment of health and quality of life, without interpretation by a specialist. PROM (patient reported outcomes measure) – questionnaires are used to analyzing this data. Assessment of the quality of life is a perspective direction, which allows to improve the quality of medical care and treatment results. Today, there are many questionnaires PROM, their reliability and validity has been proven in numerous studies. Unified standards and methods for developing and evaluating questionnaires have been developed. Interest in the use of quality of life questionnaires is increasing constantly. However, studies analyzing the data of the PROM questionnaires are rarely found in the national literature. Quality of life is also poorly researched in clinical practice. The aim of the literature review is to present modern methods for assessing the quality of life of patients, especially with cancer. A review of the most widespread and reliable questionnaires and assessment instruments for the quality of life of a patient has been carried out. The analysis of world experience of their use in clinical practice, for patients with cancer has been performed. Examples of both general and specific questionnaires are given. PROM questionnaires are widely used among patients with cancer. However, incorrect use of PROMs is found in the literature, and in patients with certain nosologies PROM data studied poorly. Further analysis of the potential of PROM questionnaires implementation is required, as well as their translation and adaptation for use in Russian health care.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Результаты, сообщаемые пациентом (PRO – patient reported outcomes) – это субъективная оценка пациентом его здоровья и качества жизни, без интерпретации со стороны специалиста. Для анализа этих данных используются опросные листы PROM (patient reported outcomes measure) – «оценка результатов, сообщаемых пациентом». Анализ качества жизни пациентов является перспективным и актуальным направлением, позволяющим улучшить оказание медицинской помощи и результаты лечения. На сегодняшний день существует большое количество опросных форм PROM, их надежность и валидность доказаны в многочисленных исследованиях. Разработаны единые стандарты и методы создания и оценки опросных листов, а интерес к применению опросных форм качества жизни неуклонно растет. Однако исследования, анализирующие данные опросных форм PROM, редко встречаются в отечественной литературе. Также недостаточно широко качество жизни изучается в клинической практике. Цель обзора литературы – представить современные методы оценки качества жизни пациентов, в особенности больных онкологическими заболеваниями. Проведен обзор наиболее распространенных и надежных опросных форм и оценочных средств качества жизни пациента. Выполнен анализ мирового опыта их применения в клинической практике у пациентов с онкологическими заболеваниями. Приведены примеры как общих, так и специфичных опросных листов. Таким образом, опросные формы PROM нашли широкое применение среди пациентов с онкологическими заболеваниями. Однако в литературе встречается некорректное использование PROM, а у больных с определенными нозологиями данные PROM недостаточно широко изучены. Требуются дальнейший анализ потенциальных возможностей применения опросных форм PROM, а также их перевод и адаптация для использования в российском здравоохранении.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>PROM</kwd><kwd>patient reported outcomes</kwd><kwd>quality of life</kwd><kwd>ambulatory surgery</kwd><kwd>oncology</kwd><kwd>postoperative control</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>PROM</kwd><kwd>результаты</kwd><kwd>сообщаемые пациентом</kwd><kwd>качество жизни</kwd><kwd>амбулаторная хирургия</kwd><kwd>онкология</kwd><kwd>послеоперационный контроль</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Weldring T, Smith SM. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights. 2013;6:61-8. DOI:10.4137/HSI.S11093</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Callahan LF. The History of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatology. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016;42(2):205-17. DOI:10.1016/j.rdc.2016.01.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Quality registries. Available at: www.kvalitetsregister.se/om_kvalitetsregister/quality_registries. Accessed: 08.12.2021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims Guidance for Industry 2009. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-development-support-labeling-claims. Accessed: 08.12.2021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Mak KS, van Bommel AC, Stowell C, et al. Defining a standard set of patient-centred outcomes for lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2016;48(3):852-60. DOI:10.1183/13993003.02049-2015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (the Commission). Available at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/indicators-measurement-and-reporting/patient-reported-outcome-measures. Accessed: 08.12.2021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Новик А.А., Ионова Т.И. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине. СПб., 2002 [Novik AA, Ionova TI. Rukovodstvo po issledovaniiu kachestva zhizni v meditsine. Saint Petersburg, 2002 (in Russian)].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717-27. DOI:10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985;35(273):185-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Richards HS, Blazeby JM, Portal A, et al. A real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following surgery: a pilot study in cancer-related surgery. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):543. DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-07027-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Ong WL, Schouwenburg MG, van Bommel ACM, et al. A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(5):677-85. DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Kerrigan K, Patel SB, Haaland B, et al. Prognostic Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16(4):e313-23. DOI:10.1200/JOP.19.00329</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Dai WF, Beca J, Guo H, et al. Are population-based patient-reported outcomes associated with overall survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer? Cancer Med. 2020;9(1):215-24. DOI:10.1002/cam4.2704</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345-53. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Davies CF, Macefield R, Avery K, et al. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Development and Measurement Properties. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(1):386-404. DOI:10.1245/s10434-020-08736-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):891-9. DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Nelson JA, Allen RJ Jr, Polanco T, et al. Long-term Patient-reported Outcomes Following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: An 8-year Examination of 3268 Patients. Ann Surg. 2019;270(3):473-83. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003467</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Zerillo JA, Schouwenburg MG, van Bommel ACM, et al. An International Collaborative Standardizing a Comprehensive Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(5):686-94. DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0417</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Besson A, Deftereos I, Chan S, et al. Understanding patient-reported outcome measures in colorectal cancer. Future Oncol. 2019;15(10):1135-46. DOI:10.2217/fon-2018-0723</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Rees JR, Whale K, Fish D, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials of colorectal cancer: an analysis determining the availability of robust data to inform clinical decision-making. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(12):2181-92. DOI:10.1007/s00432-015-1970-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Rutherford C, Campbell R, White K, King M. Patient-reported outcomes as predictors of survival in patients with bowel cancer: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(11):2871-87. DOI:10.1007/s11136-019-02255-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Bouazza YB, Chiairi I, El Kharbouchi O, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review. Lung Cancer. 2017;113:140-51. DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.09.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Polański J, Chabowski M, Jankowska-Polańska B, et al. Histological subtype of lung cancer affects acceptance of illness, severity of pain, and quality of life. J Pain Res. 2018;11:727-33. DOI:10.2147/JPR.S155121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Brønserud MM, Iachina M, Green A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in lung cancer: Experiences from a nationwide feasibility study. Lung Cancer. 2019;128:67-73. DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.12.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Martin NE, Massey L, Stowell C, et al. Defining a standard set of patient-centered outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):460-7. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.075</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Morgans AK, van Bommel AC, Stowell C, et al. Development of a Standardized Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Advanced Prostate Cancer: An International Effort for a Unified Approach. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):891-8. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Protopapa E, van der Meulen J, Moore CM, Smith SC. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires for men who have radical surgery for prostate cancer: a conceptual review of existing instruments. BJU Int. 2017;120(4):468-81. DOI:10.1111/bju.13896</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Hoffman KE, Penson DF, Zhao Z, et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes Through 5 Years for Active Surveillance, Surgery, Brachytherapy, or External Beam Radiation With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. JAMA. 2020;323(2):149-63. DOI:10.1001/jama.2019.20675</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen-Nielsen M, Møller H, Tjønneland A, Borre M. Patient-reported outcome measures after treatment for prostate cancer: Results from the Danish Prostate Cancer Registry (DAPROCAdata). Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;64:101623. DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2019.101623</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Xu J, Evans TJ, Coon C, et al. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in advanced gastric cancer. Ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7:351. DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2013.351</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Joosten PJ, et al. Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):1920-9. DOI:10.1007/s00464-015-4415-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Maharaj AD, Samoborec S, Evans SM, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). 2020;22(2):187-203. DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.002</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
